Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

The philosophy of artificial intelligence attempts to answer such questions as:

  • Can a machine act intelligently? Can it solve any problem that a person would solve by thinking?
  • Are human intelligence and machine intelligence the same? Is the human brain essentially a computer?
  • Can a machine have a mind, mental states and consciousness in the same sense humans do? Can it feel how things are?

These three questions reflect the divergent interests of AI researchers, cognitive scientists and philosophers respectively. The scientific answers to these questions depend the definition of "intelligence" and "consciousness" and exactly which "machines" are under discussion.

Important propositions in the philosophy of AI include:

  • Turing's "polite convention": If a machine behaves as intelligently as a human being, then it is as intelligent as a human being.
  • The Dartmouth proposal: "Every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it."
  • Newell and Simon's physical symbol system hypothesis: "A physical symbol system has the necessary and sufficient means of general intelligent action."
  • Searle's strong AI hypothesis: "The appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds."
  • Hobbes' mechanism: "Reason is nothing but reckoning."

Read more about Philosophy Of Artificial Intelligence:  Can A Machine Display General Intelligence?, Can A Machine Have A Mind, Consciousness and Mental States?, Is Thinking A Kind of Computation?, Other Related Questions, See Also

Famous quotes containing the words philosophy, artificial and/or intelligence:

    “A writer must always try to have a philosophy and he should also have a psychology and a philology and many other things. Without a philosophy and a psychology and all these various other things he is not really worthy of being called a writer. I agree with Kant and Schopenhauer and Plato and Spinoza and that is quite enough to be called a philosophy. But then of course a philosophy is not the same thing as a style.”
    —Gertrude Stein (1874–1946)

    “A true politeness does not result from any hasty and artificial polishing, it is true, but grows naturally in characters of the right grain and quality, through a long fronting of men and events, and rubbing on good and bad fortune.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “Though intelligence is powerless to modify character, it is a dab hand at finding euphemisms for its weaknesses.”
    —Quentin Crisp (b. 1908)