Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

The philosophy of artificial intelligence attempts to answer such questions as:

  • Can a machine act intelligently? Can it solve any problem that a person would solve by thinking?
  • Are human intelligence and machine intelligence the same? Is the human brain essentially a computer?
  • Can a machine have a mind, mental states and consciousness in the same sense humans do? Can it feel how things are?

These three questions reflect the divergent interests of AI researchers, cognitive scientists and philosophers respectively. The scientific answers to these questions depend the definition of "intelligence" and "consciousness" and exactly which "machines" are under discussion.

Important propositions in the philosophy of AI include:

  • Turing's "polite convention": If a machine behaves as intelligently as a human being, then it is as intelligent as a human being.
  • The Dartmouth proposal: "Every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it."
  • Newell and Simon's physical symbol system hypothesis: "A physical symbol system has the necessary and sufficient means of general intelligent action."
  • Searle's strong AI hypothesis: "The appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds."
  • Hobbes' mechanism: "Reason is nothing but reckoning."

Read more about Philosophy Of Artificial Intelligence:  Can A Machine Display General Intelligence?, Can A Machine Have A Mind, Consciousness and Mental States?, Is Thinking A Kind of Computation?, Other Related Questions, See Also

Famous quotes containing the words philosophy of, philosophy, artificial and/or intelligence:

    “The philosophy of hedonism means little to lovers of pleasure. They have no inclination to read philosophy, or to write it.”
    —Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    “Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
    —Paul Tillich (1886–1965)

    “The tendencies of the times favor the idea of self-government, and leave the individual, for all code, to the rewards and penalties of his own constitution, which work with more energy than we believe, whilst we depend on artificial restraints.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “You have to begin to lose your memory, if only in bits and pieces, to realize that memory is what makes our lives. Life without memory is no life at all, just as an intelligence without the possibility of expression is not really an intelligence. Our memory is our coherence, our reason, our feeling, even our action. Without it, we are nothing.”
    —Luis Buñuel (1900–1983)