Practical Implementation: Continuity and The Minimum Image Convention
To implement periodic boundary conditions in practice, at least two steps are needed.
The first is to make an object which leaves the simulation cell on one side enter back on the other. This is of course a simple operation, and could in code be e.g. (for the x dimension, assuming an orthogonal unit cell centered on the origin):
if (periodicx) then if (x < -xsize*0.5) x=x+xsize if (x >= xsize*0.5) x=x-xsize endifThe second is to make sure that every distance between atoms, or other vector calculated from one atom to another, has a length and direction which corresponds to the minimum image criterion. This can be achieved as follows to calculate e.g. the x direction distance component from atom i to atom j:
if (periodicx) then dx = x(j) - x(i) if (abs(dx) > xsize*0.5) dx = dx - sign(xsize,dx) endifNaturally both operations should be repeated in all 3 dimensions.
These operations can be written in much more compact form for orthorhombic cells if the origin is shifted to a corner of the box. Then we have, in one dimension, for positions and distances respectively:
! After x(i) update without regard to PBC: x(i)=x(i)-floor(x(i)/xsize)*xsize !For a box with the origin at the lower left vertex ! Works for xs lying in any image. dx=x(j)-x(i) dx=dx-nint(dx/(0.5*xsize))*xsizeFor non-orthorhombic cells the situation can be considerably more complicated.
In simulations of ionic systems considerably more complicated operations may be needed to handle the long-range Coulomb interactions.
Read more about this topic: Periodic Boundary Conditions
Famous quotes containing the words practical, continuity, minimum, image and/or convention:
“One of the great triumphs of the nineteenth century was to limit the connotation of the word “immoral” in such a way that, for practical purposes, only those were immoral who drank too much or made too copious love. Those who indulged in any or all of the other deadly sins could look down in righteous indignation on the lascivious and the gluttonous.... In the name of all lechers and boozers I most solemnly protest against the invidious distinction made to our prejudice.”
—Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)
“If you associate enough with older people who do enjoy their lives, who are not stored away in any golden ghettos, you will gain a sense of continuity and of the possibility for a full life.”
—Margaret Mead (1901–1978)
“After decades of unappreciated drudgery, American women just don’t do housework any more—that is, beyond the minimum that is required in order to clear a path from the bedroom to the front door so they can get off to work in the mourning.”
—Barbara Ehrenreich (20th century)
“The “female culture” has shifted more rapidly than the “male culture”; the image of the go-get ‘em woman has yet to be fully matched by the image of the let’s take-care-of-the-kids- together man. More important, over the last thirty years, men’s underlying feelings about taking responsibility at home have changed much less than women’s feelings have changed about forging some kind of identity at work.”
—Arlie Hochschild (20th century)
“Every one knows about the young man who falls in love with the chorus-girl because she can kick his hat off, and his sister’s friends can’t or won’t. But the youth who marries her, expecting that all her departures from convention will be as agile or as delightful to him as that, is still the classic example of folly.”
—Katharine Fullerton Gerould (1879–1944)