Percolation Threshold - General Formulas For Exact Results

General Formulas For Exact Results

Inhomogeneous triangular lattice bond percolation


1 - p_1 - p_2 - p_3 + p_1 p_2 p_3 = 0

Inhomogeneous honeycomb lattice bond percolation = kagome lattice site percolation


1 - p_1 p_2 - p_1 p_3 - p_2 p_3+ p_1 p_2 p_3 = 0

Inhomogeneous (3,12^2) lattice, site percolation


1 - 3(s_1s_2)^2 + (s_1s_2)^3 = 0,
or 
s_1 s_2 = 1 - 2 \sin(\pi/18)

Inhomogeneous martini lattice, bond percolation 
1 - (p_1 p_2 r_3 + p_2 p_3 r_1 + p_1 p_3 r_2) - (p_1 p_2 r_1 r_2
+ p_1 p_3 r_1 r_3 + p_2 p_3 r_2 r_3) + p_1 p_2 p_3 ( r_1 r_2
+ r_1 r_3 + r_2 r_3) +

r_1 r_2 r_3 (p_1 p_2
+ p_1 p_3 + p_2 p_3) - 2 p_1 p_2 p_3 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 0

Inhomogeneous martini lattice, site percolation). r = site in the star


1 - r (p_1 p_2 + p_1 p_3 + p_2 p_3 - p_1 p_2 p_3) = 0

Inhomogeneous martini-A (3–7) lattice, bond percolation. Left side (top of "A" to bottom): . Right side: . Cross bond: .


1 - p_1 r_2 - p_2 r_1 - p_1 p_2 r_3 - p_1 r_1 r_3
- p_2 r_2 r_3 + p_1 p_2 r_1 r_3 + p_1 p_2 r_2 r_3
+ p_1 r_1 r_2 r_3+ p_2 r_1 r_2 r_3 - p_1 p_2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 0

Inhomogeneous martini-B (3–5) lattice, bond percolation

Inhomogeneous checkerboard lattice, bond percolation

 1 - (p_1 p_2 + p_1 p_3 + p_1 p_4 + p_2 p_3 + p_2 p_4 + p_3 p_4) + p_1 p_2 p_3 + p_1 p_2 p_4 + p_1 p_3 p_4 + p_2 p_3 p_4 = 0

Inhomogeneous bow-tie lattice, bond percolation


1 - (p_1 p_2 + p_1 p_3 + p_1 p_4 + p_2 p_3 + p_2 p_4 + p_3 p_4) + p_1 p_2 p_3 + p_1 p_2 p_4 + p_1 p_3 p_4 + p_2 p_3 p_4 +
 u(1 - p_1 p_2 - p_3 p_4 + p_1 p_2 p_3 p_4) = 0

where are the four bonds around the square and is the diagonal bond connecting the vertex between bonds and .

Read more about this topic:  Percolation Threshold

Famous quotes containing the words general, formulas, exact and/or results:

    Then comes my fit again. I had else been perfect,
    Whole as the marble, founded as the rock,
    As broad and general as the casing air.
    But now I am cabined, cribbed, confined, bound in
    To saucy doubts and fears.
    William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

    That’s the great danger of sectarian opinions, they always accept the formulas of past events as useful for the measurement of future events and they never are, if you have high standards of accuracy.
    John Dos Passos (1896–1970)

    Neither Aristotelian nor Russellian rules give the exact logic of any expression of ordinary language; for ordinary language has no exact logic.
    Sir Peter Frederick Strawson (b. 1919)

    For every life and every act
    Consequence of good and evil can be shown
    And as in time results of many deeds are blended
    So good and evil in the end become confounded.
    —T.S. (Thomas Stearns)