Peracetic Acid - Safety

Safety

Peracetic acid is a strong oxidizing agent (E = 1.762 V vs Ag/AgCl) and a primary irritant. Exposure to peracetic acid can cause irritation to the skin, eyes and respiratory system and higher or long-term exposure can cause permanent lung damage. In addition, there have been cases of occupational asthma caused by peracetic acid. There is no US-OSHA permissible exposure limit for peracetic acid, but this does not mean the compound is harmless. In 2010, the US-EPA published Acute Exposure Guidelines (AEGL) for peracetic acid.

eight-hour TWA AEGL Definition mg/m3 ppm
1 The concentration at which the general population will experience transient and reversible problems, such as notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic non-sensory effects. 0.52 0.17
2 The concentration that results in irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape. 1.6 0.52
3 The concentration that results in life-threatening health effects or death 4.1 1.3

In comparison, the OSHA PEL for hydrogen peroxide (8 hour TWA) is 1.0 ppm. Peracetic acid has found widespread use in healthcare, food processing, and water treatment because of its broad antimicrobial properties. In order for employers to comply with the General Duty Clause to provide a safe work environment, it is recommended that facilities using peracetic acid solution employ continuous monitors to provide an alert to employees if the concentration exceeds safe levels. This monitor is designed and installed so that it can automatically turn on additional ventilation as needed.

Concentrated peroxyacetic acid, an organic peroxide, explodes at 110 °C.

Read more about this topic:  Peracetic Acid

Famous quotes containing the word safety:

    An evident principle ... is the principle of justice to all peoples and nationalities, and their right to live on equal terms of liberty and safety with one another, whether they be strong or weak.
    Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924)

    If we can find a principle to guide us in the handling of the child between nine and eighteen months, we can see that we need to allow enough opportunity for handling and investigation of objects to further intellectual development and just enough restriction required for family harmony and for the safety of the child.
    Selma H. Fraiberg (20th century)

    Once women begin to question the inevitability of their subordination and to reject the conventions formerly associated with it, they can no longer retreat to the safety of those conventions. The woman who rejects the stereotype of feminine weakness and dependence can no longer find much comfort in the cliché that all men are beasts. She has no choice except to believe, on the contrary, that men are human beings, and she finds it hard to forgive them when they act like animals.
    Christopher Lasch (b. 1932)