Parallel Random-access Machine - Read/write Conflicts

Read/write Conflicts

Read/write conflicts in accessing the same shared memory location simultaneously are resolved by one of the following strategies:

  1. Exclusive read exclusive write (EREW)—every memory cell can be read or written to by only one processor at a time
  2. Concurrent read exclusive write (CREW)—multiple processors can read a memory cell but only one can write at a time
  3. Exclusive read concurrent write (ERCW)—never considered
  4. Concurrent read concurrent write (CRCW)—multiple processors can read and write. A CRCW PRAM is sometimes called a concurrent random-access machine.

Here, E and C stand for 'exclusive' and 'concurrent' respectively. The read causes no discrepancies while the concurrent write is further defined as:

Common—all processors write the same value; otherwise is illegal
Arbitrary—only one arbitrary attempt is successful, others retire
Priority—processor rank indicates who gets to write
Another kind of array reduction operation like SUM, Logical AND or MAX.

Several simplifying assumptions are made while considering the development of algorithms for PRAM. They are:

  1. There is no limit on the number of processors in the machine.
  2. Any memory location is uniformly accessible from any processor.
  3. There is no limit on the amount of shared memory in the system.
  4. Resource contention is absent.
  5. The programs written on these machines are, in general, of type MIMD. Certain special cases such as SIMD may also be handled in such a framework.

These kinds of algorithms are useful for understanding the exploitation of concurrency, dividing the original problem into similar sub-problems and solving them in parallel.

Read more about this topic:  Parallel Random-access Machine

Famous quotes containing the words read, write and/or conflicts:

    I lately met with an old volume from a London bookshop, containing the Greek Minor Poets, and it was a pleasure to read once more only the words Orpheus, Linus, Musæus,—those faint poetic sounds and echoes of a name, dying away on the ears of us modern men; and those hardly more substantial sounds, Mimnermus, Ibycus, Alcæus, Stesichorus, Menander. They lived not in vain. We can converse with these bodiless fames without reserve or personality.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    There is perhaps no more obvious vanity than to write of it so vainly.
    Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)

    The extrovert and introvert, the realist and idealist, the scientist and philosopher, the man who found himself by refinding his life history and the individual who discovered his being in fantasy, these are the differences between Freud and Jung.
    —Robert S. Steele. Freud and Jung: Conflicts of Interpretation, ch. 10, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1982)