Results
The results saw the PML-N win a landslide victory, winning by the largest margin since the 1977 election. The PPP came second with only 18 seats while Khan's Movement for Justice failed to win any seats. The turnout, at around 36%, was the lowest ever in the history of elections in Pakistan.
Parties | Votes | % | Seats | +/– |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pakistan Muslim League (N) | 8,751,793 | 45.9 | 137 | +64 |
Pakistan Peoples Party | 4,152,209 | 21.8 | 18 | –71 |
Haq Parast | 764,207 | 4.0 | 12 | New |
Pakistan Muslim League (J) | 624,286 | 3.3 | 0 | –6 |
Awami National Party | 357,002 | 1.9 | 10 | +7 |
Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto) | 377,228 | 2.0 | 1 | New |
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) | 325,910 | 1.7 | 2 | New |
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf | 314,820 | 1.7 | 0 | New |
Balochistan National Party | 124,754 | 0.7 | 3 | New |
National Peoples Party (Khar) | 85,121 | 0.4 | 1 | 0 |
Balochistan National Movement | 72,354 | 0.4 | 0 | New |
Jamhoori Wattan Party | 66,128 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 |
Muslim Ittehad Pakistan | 49,601 | 0.3 | 0 | New |
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (S) | 48,838 | 0.3 | 0 | New |
Pakistan Democratic Party | 47,153 | 0.2 | 0 | New |
Muslim League (Qayyum) | 37,723 | 0.2 | 0 | New |
Pakistan Awami Party | 31,615 | 0.2 | 0 | New |
30 other parties | 88,429 | 0.5 | 0 | – |
Independents | 1,482,033 | 7.4 | 21 | +5 |
Invalid/blank votes | 448,829 | – | – | – |
Total | 19,516,716 | 100 | 207 | 0 |
Source: Nohlen et al |
Read more about this topic: Pakistani General Election, 1997
Famous quotes containing the word results:
“Nothing is as difficult as to achieve results in this world if one is filled full of great tolerance and the milk of human kindness. The person who achieves must generally be a one-ideaed individual, concentrated entirely on that one idea, and ruthless in his aspect toward other men and other ideas.”
—Corinne Roosevelt Robinson (18611933)
“For every life and every act
Consequence of good and evil can be shown
And as in time results of many deeds are blended
So good and evil in the end become confounded.”
—T.S. (Thomas Stearns)
“There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
—Paul Feyerabend (19241994)