Optimal Foraging and Diet Breadth
The predator attempts to maximize E/(h+s), where s is the search time involved. For a range of prey, the predators average intake rate is Eaverage/(haverage+saverage). Where Eaverage is the average energy of all prey items in the diet, haverage is the average handling time and saverage is the average search time.
When the predator has found an item it doesn’t currently eat, it has two choices. It can eat the new item, in which case the profitability is Enew/hnew or it can leave it and search for an item already in its diet, in which case we use Eaverage/(haverage+saverage). The predator should eat this new item when Enew/hnew ≥ Eaverage/(haverage+saverage) because the new item increases its energy intake per unit time.
This leads to a number of insights:
- Predators with short handling times relative to their search times should be generalists and include a wide range of items in their diet. They will hunt and eat every prey they encounter since the prey is far apart and the handling time is short.
- Predators with long handling times relative to their search time should be specialists and only include the most efficient items in their diet. They will maximize their efficiency by only eating prey with high energy contents since the handling time is long and the search time is short.
- Predators should be generalists in unproductive environments and specialists in productive environments.
- Predator-prey co-evolution often makes it non-profitable for a prey item to be included in the diet, since many anti-predator defenses increase handling time. Examples include porcupine quills, the palatability and digestibility of the poison dart frog, crypsis and other predator avoidance behaviors.
- The Digestive Rate Model suggests that species can avoid predation by increasing the amount of indigestible bulk, e.g. shell material for molluscs, seed husks or fibre content in plants.
Read more about this topic: Optimal Foraging Theory
Famous quotes containing the words optimal, foraging, diet and/or breadth:
“In the most desirable conditions, the child learns to manage anxiety by being exposed to just the right amounts of it, not much more and not much less. This optimal amount of anxiety varies with the child’s age and temperament. It may also vary with cultural values.... There is no mathematical formula for calculating exact amounts of optimal anxiety. This is why child rearing is an art and not a science.”
—Alicia F. Lieberman (20th century)
“Soft are the hands of Love,
but what soft hands
clutched at the thorny ground,
scratched like a small white ferret
or foraging whippet or hound.”
—Hilda Doolittle (1886–1961)
“Television programming for children need not be saccharine or insipid in order to give to violence its proper balance in the scheme of things.... But as an endless diet for the sake of excitement and sensation in stories whose plots are vehicles for killing and torture and little more, it is not healthy for young children. Unfamiliar as yet with the full story of human response, they are being misled when they are offered perversion before they have fully learned what is sound.”
—Dorothy H. Cohen (20th century)
“We are made happy when reason can discover no occasion for it. The memory of some past moments is more persuasive than the experience of present ones. There have been visions of such breadth and brightness that these motes were invisible in their light.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)