Worked Example
The following is an example of calculating number needed to harm.
In a cohort study, individuals with exposure to a risk factor (Exposure +) are followed for a certain number of years to see if they develop a certain disease or outcome (Disease +). A control group of individuals who are not exposed to the risk factor (Exposure −) are also followed . "Follow up time" is the number of individuals in each group multiplied by the number of years that each individual is followed:
| Disease + | Total subjects followed | Years followed^ | Follow-up time | Incidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure + | 6054 | 86318 | 13.56^ | 1,170,074 | 0.0703 |
| Exposure − | 32 | 516 | 21.84^ | 11,270 | 0.0620 |
^ "Years followed" is a weighted average of the length of time the patients were followed.
The incidence with exposure is:
The incidence without exposure:
To determine the relative risk, divide the incidence with exposure by the incidence without exposure:
- relative risk
To determine attributable risk subtract incidence without exposure from incidence with exposure:
- 0.0703 − 0.0620 = 0.0083 = 0.83% = attributable risk
The number needed to harm is the inverse of the attributable risk, or:
- = Number needed to harm
This means that if 120 individuals are exposed to the risk factor, 1 will develop the disease that would not have otherwise.
Note that these calculations can be affected enormously by roundoff error. (If no roundoff is used in the intermediate calculations above, the final figure for the NNH is 123.)
Read more about this topic: Number Needed To Harm
Famous quotes containing the word worked:
“Fasten your hair with a golden pin,
And bind up every wandering tress;
I bade my heart build these poor rhymes:
It worked at them, day out, day in,
Building a sorrowful loveliness
Out of the battles of old times.”
—William Butler Yeats (1865–1939)
“Tailor’s work—the finishing of men’s outside garments—was the “trade” learned most frequently by women in [the 1820s and 1830s], and one or more of my older sisters worked at it; I think it must have been at home, for I somehow or somewhere got the idea, while I was a small child, that the chief end of woman was to make clothing for mankind.”
—Lucy Larcom (1824–1893)