North Spokane Corridor - Route Description

Route Description

It will run from I-90 just east of Downtown Spokane northward about 10.5 miles (16.9 km), and will meet the existing US 395 just north of Spokane at Wandermere. However in the late 1990s, a new bridge was built across the Little Spokane River, and a freeway interchange was added at Hatch Road. Upon completion of the North Spokane Corridor, it is likely that no distinction will be made for the earlier section, and the freeway will be seen as running from I-90 to Hatch Road. Beyond Hatch Road, an additional 3.3 miles was widened to four lanes, with minimal cross traffic.

The North Spokane Corridor is planned to bypass the busy Division Street corridor. The new freeway will carry the US 395 designation, and run about one mile (1.6 km) east of where it was originally planned in the 1960s and 1970s.

While the new freeway would also be a good routing for US 2 to bypass Spokane, that highway is scheduled to stay on its current routing in order to keep most of Division Street in the state highway system. Nevertheless, it will be easy for motorists on US 2 to avoid this by using the freeway instead of Division Street. On the north side, a full interchange has been constructed at US 2 in the Mead area near Farwell Road. This route uses the entire North Spokane Corridor except the northernmost one mile (1.6 km) section between US 2 and Wandermere. Division street between the "Y" (historical US 395 and US 2 split) and Wandermere will no longer be in the state highway system. This includes about one-half mile of the new section of Division Street just north of Farwell Road.

Read more about this topic:  North Spokane Corridor

Famous quotes containing the words route and/or description:

    But however the forms of family life have changed and the number expanded, the role of the family has remained constant and it continues to be the major institution through which children pass en route to adulthood.
    Bernice Weissbourd (20th century)

    Everything to which we concede existence is a posit from the standpoint of a description of the theory-building process, and simultaneously real from the standpoint of the theory that is being built. Nor let us look down on the standpoint of the theory as make-believe; for we can never do better than occupy the standpoint of some theory or other, the best we can muster at the time.
    Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)