The National Compact Stellarator Experiment (NCSX) is a plasma confinement experiment that was being conducted at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. NCSX used magnets and layout designed through massively parallel computing to find the optimal shape for the reactor vessel, leading to a compact device. The project was cancelled on 22 May 2008 due to a failure to meet budgetary constraints.
NCSX is a variation of the stellarator concept, with a much lower aspect ratio than a typical stellarator. One of the advantages of correctly-designed stellarators is that the confined plasma is passively stable when a steady magnetic field is applied, whereas tokamaks require an array of active control strategies to stabilize the plasma, even under a constant magnetic field. Up to 12 MW of auxiliary heating power would have been available to the NCSX chamber, consisting of 6 MW from tangential neutral beam injection, and 6MW from radio-frequency (RF) heating. Up to 3 MW of electron cyclotron heating would also have been available in future iterations of the design. The assembly tolerances were very tight and required state of the art use of metrology systems including Laser Tracker and photogrammetry equipment. $50 million of additional funding was needed, spread over the next 3 years, to complete the assembly within tolerance requirements. Components for the Stellerator were measured with 3d laser scanning, and inspected to design models at multiple stages in the manufacturing process.
Read more about National Compact Stellarator Experiment: See Also
Famous quotes containing the words national, compact and/or experiment:
“The progress
Is permanent like the preordained bulk
Of the First National Bank
Like fish sauce, but agreeable.”
—John Ashbery (b. 1927)
“... in a history of spiritual rupture, a social compact built on fantasy and collective secrets, poetry becomes more necessary than ever: it keeps the underground aquifers flowing; it is the liquid voice that can wear through stone.”
—Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)
“I look on it as no trifling effort of female strength to withstand the artful and ardent solicitations of a man that is thoroughly master of our hearts. Should we in the conflict come off victorious, it hardly pays us for the pain we suffer from the experiment ... and I still persist in it that such a behaviour in any man I love would rob me of that most pleasing thought, namely, the obligation I have to him for not making such a trial.”
—Sarah Fielding (17101768)