Languages
Nahahup consists of about four languages, based on mutual intelligibility. Nadeb and Kuyawi, Hup and Yahup, and Nukak and Kakwa, however, share 90% of their vocabulary and are mutually intelligible, and so are separate languages only in a sociolinguistic sense. These four branches are not close: Although the family was first suggested in 1906, only 300 cognates have been found, which include pronouns but no other grammatical forms.
| gloss | Nadëb | Hup | Dâw | Nïkâk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| father | ʔɨb | ʔip | ʔiːp | ʔiːp (Kakwa ʔip) |
| egg | tɨb | tip | tɨp | tip (Kakwa) |
| water | mi | mĩh | mĩʔ | mah (Kakwa) |
| tooth | təɡᵑ (Kuyawi) | təɡᵑ | təɡ | — |
| house | — | mõj | mɔ͂j | mɨ͂ |
Nadëb may be the most divergent; of the other languages, there is disagreement on the placement of Nïkâk. Martins (1999) propose two classifications, pending further research:
- Martins, proposal A
| Nadahup |
|
|||||||||||||||
- Martins, proposal B
| Nadahup |
|
|||||||||||||||
However, Epps considers Hup and Yahup to be distinct languages, and maintains that the inclusion of the poorly attested Nukak and Kakwa has not been demonstrated and is in fact highly dubious:
- Epps
| Nadahup |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Read more about this topic: Nadahup Languages
Famous quotes containing the word languages:
“People in places many of us never heard of, whose names we can’t pronounce or even spell, are speaking up for themselves. They speak in languages we once classified as “exotic” but whose mastery is now essential for our diplomats and businessmen. But what they say is very much the same the world over. They want a decent standard of living. They want human dignity and a voice in their own futures. They want their children to grow up strong and healthy and free.”
—Hubert H. Humphrey (1911–1978)
“The trouble with foreign languages is, you have to think before your speak.”
—Swedish proverb, trans. by Verne Moberg.
“The less sophisticated of my forbears avoided foreigners at all costs, for the very good reason that, in their circles, speaking in tongues was commonly a prelude to snake handling. The more tolerant among us regarded foreign languages as a kind of speech impediment that could be overcome by willpower.”
—Barbara Ehrenreich (b. 1941)