Comparison
Percentages in table below refer to how large fraction of people with the MEN type develop the neoplasia type.
Feature | MEN 1 | MEN 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MEN 2A | MEN 2B | FMTC | ||
Eponym | Wermer syndrome | Sipple syndrome | (multiple) | (none) |
OMIM | 131100 | 171400 | 162300 | 155240 |
Pancreatic tumors | gastrinoma (50%), insulinoma (20%), vipoma, glucagonoma, PPoma |
- | - | - |
Pituitary adenoma | 66% | - | - | - |
Angiofibroma | 64%* | - | - | - |
Lipoma | 17%* | - | - | - |
Parathyroid hyperplasia | 90% | 50% | - | - |
Medullary thyroid carcinoma | - | 100% | 85% | 100% |
Pheochromocytoma | - | >33% | 50% | - |
Marfanoid body habitus | - | - | 80% | - |
Mucosal neuroma | - | - | 100% | - |
Gene(s) | MEN1 (131100) | RET (164761) | RET (164761) | RET (164761), NTRK1 (191315) |
Approx. prevalence | 1 in 35,000 (1 in 20,000 to 1 in 40,000) |
1 in 40,000 | 1 in 40,000 | |
Initial description (year) | 1954 | 1961 | 1965 |
*- of patients with MEN1 and gastrinoma
FMTC = familial medullary thyroid cancer
MEN 2B is sometimes known as MEN 3 and the designation varies by institution (c.f. www.ClinicalReview.com). Although a variety of additional eponyms have been proposed for MEN2B (e.g. Williams-Pollock syndrome, Gorlin-Vickers syndrome, and Wagenmann–Froboese syndrome), none ever gained sufficient traction to merit continued use and, indeed, are all but abandoned in the medical literature. Another early report was Schimke et al. in 1968.
OMIM also includes a fourth form of multiple endocrine neoplasia ("MEN4"), associated with CDKN1B. The presentation is believed to overlap that of MEN1 and MEN2.
Read more about this topic: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“Away with the cant of Measures, not men!Mthe idle supposition that it is the harness and not the horses that draw the chariot along. No, Sir, if the comparison must be made, if the distinction must be taken, men are everything, measures comparatively nothing.”
—George Canning (17701827)
“In comparison to the French Revolution, the American Revolution has come to seem a parochial and rather dull event. This, despite the fact that the American Revolution was successfulrealizing the purposes of the revolutionaries and establishing a durable political regimewhile the French Revolution was a resounding failure, devouring its own children and leading to an imperial despotism, followed by an eventual restoration of the monarchy.”
—Irving Kristol (b. 1920)
“Certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moments comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)