Comparison
Percentages in table below refer to how large fraction of people with the MEN type develop the neoplasia type.
| Feature | MEN 1 | MEN 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN 2A | MEN 2B | FMTC | ||
| Eponym | Wermer syndrome | Sipple syndrome | (multiple) | (none) |
| OMIM | 131100 | 171400 | 162300 | 155240 |
| Pancreatic tumors | gastrinoma (50%), insulinoma (20%), vipoma, glucagonoma, PPoma |
- | - | - |
| Pituitary adenoma | 66% | - | - | - |
| Angiofibroma | 64%* | - | - | - |
| Lipoma | 17%* | - | - | - |
| Parathyroid hyperplasia | 90% | 50% | - | - |
| Medullary thyroid carcinoma | - | 100% | 85% | 100% |
| Pheochromocytoma | - | >33% | 50% | - |
| Marfanoid body habitus | - | - | 80% | - |
| Mucosal neuroma | - | - | 100% | - |
| Gene(s) | MEN1 (131100) | RET (164761) | RET (164761) | RET (164761), NTRK1 (191315) |
| Approx. prevalence | 1 in 35,000 (1 in 20,000 to 1 in 40,000) |
1 in 40,000 | 1 in 40,000 | |
| Initial description (year) | 1954 | 1961 | 1965 | |
*- of patients with MEN1 and gastrinoma
FMTC = familial medullary thyroid cancer
MEN 2B is sometimes known as MEN 3 and the designation varies by institution (c.f. www.ClinicalReview.com). Although a variety of additional eponyms have been proposed for MEN2B (e.g. Williams-Pollock syndrome, Gorlin-Vickers syndrome, and Wagenmann–Froboese syndrome), none ever gained sufficient traction to merit continued use and, indeed, are all but abandoned in the medical literature. Another early report was Schimke et al. in 1968.
OMIM also includes a fourth form of multiple endocrine neoplasia ("MEN4"), associated with CDKN1B. The presentation is believed to overlap that of MEN1 and MEN2.
Read more about this topic: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“But the best read naturalist who lends an entire and devout attention to truth, will see that there remains much to learn of his relation to the world, and that it is not to be learned by any addition or subtraction or other comparison of known quantities, but is arrived at by untaught sallies of the spirit, by a continual self-recovery, and by entire humility.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.””
—Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)
“When we reflect on our past sentiments and affections, our thought is a faithful mirror, and copies its objects truly; but the colours which it employs are faint and dull, in comparison of those in which our original perceptions were clothed.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)