Comparison
Percentages in table below refer to how large fraction of people with the MEN type develop the neoplasia type.
| Feature | MEN 1 | MEN 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN 2A | MEN 2B | FMTC | ||
| Eponym | Wermer syndrome | Sipple syndrome | (multiple) | (none) |
| OMIM | 131100 | 171400 | 162300 | 155240 |
| Pancreatic tumors | gastrinoma (50%), insulinoma (20%), vipoma, glucagonoma, PPoma |
- | - | - |
| Pituitary adenoma | 66% | - | - | - |
| Angiofibroma | 64%* | - | - | - |
| Lipoma | 17%* | - | - | - |
| Parathyroid hyperplasia | 90% | 50% | - | - |
| Medullary thyroid carcinoma | - | 100% | 85% | 100% |
| Pheochromocytoma | - | >33% | 50% | - |
| Marfanoid body habitus | - | - | 80% | - |
| Mucosal neuroma | - | - | 100% | - |
| Gene(s) | MEN1 (131100) | RET (164761) | RET (164761) | RET (164761), NTRK1 (191315) |
| Approx. prevalence | 1 in 35,000 (1 in 20,000 to 1 in 40,000) |
1 in 40,000 | 1 in 40,000 | |
| Initial description (year) | 1954 | 1961 | 1965 | |
*- of patients with MEN1 and gastrinoma
FMTC = familial medullary thyroid cancer
MEN 2B is sometimes known as MEN 3 and the designation varies by institution (c.f. www.ClinicalReview.com). Although a variety of additional eponyms have been proposed for MEN2B (e.g. Williams-Pollock syndrome, Gorlin-Vickers syndrome, and Wagenmann–Froboese syndrome), none ever gained sufficient traction to merit continued use and, indeed, are all but abandoned in the medical literature. Another early report was Schimke et al. in 1968.
OMIM also includes a fourth form of multiple endocrine neoplasia ("MEN4"), associated with CDKN1B. The presentation is believed to overlap that of MEN1 and MEN2.
Read more about this topic: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“Most parents aren’t even aware of how often they compare their children. . . . Comparisons carry the suggestion that specific conditions exist for parental love and acceptance. Thus, even when one child comes out on top in a comparison she is left feeling uneasy about the tenuousness of her position and the possibility of faring less well in the next comparison.”
—Marianne E. Neifert (20th century)
“What is man in nature? A nothing in comparison with the infinite, an all in comparison with the nothing—a mean between nothing and everything.”
—Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)
“When we reflect on our past sentiments and affections, our thought is a faithful mirror, and copies its objects truly; but the colours which it employs are faint and dull, in comparison of those in which our original perceptions were clothed.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)