Molecular Graph - History

History

Arthur Cayley was probably the first to publish results that consider molecular graphs as early as in 1874, even before the introduction of the term "graph". For the purposes of enumeration of isomers, Cayley considered "diagrams" made of ponts labelled by atoms and connected by links into an assemblage. He further introduced the terms plerogram and kenogram, which are the molecular graph and the hydrogen-suppressed molecular graph respectively. If, further one continues to delete atoms connected by a single link, one arrives to a mere kenogram, possibly empty.

Danail Bonchev in his Chemical Graph Theory traces the origins of representation of chemical forces by diagrams which may be called "chemical graphs" as early as to mid-18th century. In early 18th century, Isaac Newton's notion of gravity had led to speculative ideas that atoms are held together by some kind of "gravitational force". In particular, since 1758 Scottish chemist William Cullen in his lectures used what he called "affinity dagrams" to represent forces supposedly existing between pairs of molecules in a chemical reaction. In a 1789 book by William Higgins similar diagrams were used to represent forces within molecules. These and some other contemporary diagrams had no relation to chemical bonds: the latter notion was introduced only in the following century.

Read more about this topic:  Molecular Graph

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    In history an additional result is commonly produced by human actions beyond that which they aim at and obtain—that which they immediately recognize and desire. They gratify their own interest; but something further is thereby accomplished, latent in the actions in question, though not present to their consciousness, and not included in their design.
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831)

    Indeed, the Englishman’s history of New England commences only when it ceases to be New France.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    The history of our era is the nauseating and repulsive history of the crucifixion of the procreative body for the glorification of the spirit.
    —D.H. (David Herbert)