Michel de Certeau - Major Works

Major Works

In French:

  • La Culture au Pluriel. Union Générale d'Editions,1974.
  • L'Ecriture de l'Histoire. Editions Gallimard. 1975.
  • La Fable Mystique. vol. 1, XVIe-XVIIe Siècle. Editions Gallimard. 1982.
  • Histoire et psychanalyse entre science et fiction. Editions Gallimard. 1987. (Rev.ed. 2002)
  • La Faiblesse de Croire. Edited by Luce Giard. Seuil. 1987.
  • L'Invention du Quotidien. Vol. 1, Arts de Faire. Union générale d'éditions 10-18. 1980.
  • With Dominique Julia and Jacques Revel. Une Politique de la Langue : La Révolution Française et les Patois, l'enquête de Grégoire. Gallimard. 1975.
  • La Possession de Loudun. Gallimard. 1970.

In English:

  • The Capture of Speech and Other Political Writings. Translated by Tom Conley. University of Minnesota Press. 1998.
  • The Certeau Reader. Edited by Graham Ward. Blackwell Publishers. 1999.
  • Culture in the Plural. Translated by Tom Conley. University of Minnesota Press. 1998.
  • Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Translated by Brain Massumi. University of Minnesota Press. 1986.
  • The Mystic Fable: The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Translated by Michael B. Smith. University of Chicago Press. 1995.
  • The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Rendall. University of California Press. 1984.
  • With Luce Giard and Pierre Mayol. The Practice of Everyday Life. Vol. 2, Living and Cooking. Translated by Timothy J. Tomasik. University of Minnesota Press. 1998.
  • The Possession at Loudun. University of Chicago Press. 2000.
  • The Writing of History. Translated by Tom Conley. Columbia University Press. 1988.

Read more about this topic:  Michel De Certeau

Famous quotes containing the words major and/or works:

    “In the larger view the major forces of the depression now lie outside of the United States, and our recuperation has been retarded by the unwarranted degree of fear and apprehension created by these outside forces.”
    —Herbert Hoover (1874–1964)

    “Most young black females learn to be suspicious and critical of feminist thinking long before they have any clear understanding of its theory and politics.... Without rigorously engaging feminist thought, they insist that racial separatism works best. This attitude is dangerous. It not only erases the reality of common female experience as a basis for academic study; it also constructs a framework in which differences cannot be examined comparatively.”
    —bell hooks (b. c. 1955)