Messianic Democracy

Messianic Democracy

Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of
government
Power structure
  • Confederal
  • Federal
  • Hegemony
  • Imperial
  • Unitary
Power source
Democracy
  • direct
  • representative
  • polyarchy
  • other
Monarchy
  • absolute
  • constitutional
Oligarchy
  • aristocracy
  • military junta
  • plutocracy
  • stratocracy
  • timocracy
Authoritarian
  • autocracy
  • despotism
  • dictatorship
  • totalitarianism
Other
  • anarchy
  • anocracy
  • kritarchy
  • republic
  • theocracy
List of forms of government
Politics portal
Part of the Politics series
Democracy
  • History
  • Outline
Basic forms
  • Direct
  • Representative
Variants
  • Anticipatory
  • Consensus
  • Deliberative
  • Demarchy
  • Economic
  • Electronic
  • Grassroots
  • Illiberal
  • Inclusive
  • Liberal
  • Non-partisan
  • Ochlocracy
  • Participatory
  • Radical
  • Religious
  • Representative direct
  • Sociocracy
  • Soviet
  • Totalitarian
  • Other
Politics portal

Totalitarian democracy is a term made famous by Israeli historian J. L. Talmon to refer to a system of government in which lawfully elected representatives maintain the integrity of a nation state whose citizens, while granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of the government. The phrase had previously been used by Bertrand de Jouvenel and E.H. Carr, and subsequently by F. William Engdahl and Sheldon S. Wolin.

Read more about Messianic Democracy:  Criticism of Rousseau's Ideas, Differences in Democratic Philosophy, F. William Engdahl and Sheldon S. Wolin

Famous quotes containing the words messianic and/or democracy:

    I think the Messianic concept, which is the Jewish offering to mankind, is a great victory. What does it mean? It means that history has a sense, a meaning, a direction; it goes somewhere, and necessarily in a good direction—the Messiah.
    Elie Wiesel (b. 1928)

    When an opinion has taken root in a democracy and established itself in the minds of the majority, it afterward persists by itself, needing no effort to maintain it since no one attacks it. Those who at first rejected it as false come in the end to adopt it as accepted, and even those who still at the bottom of their hearts oppose it keep their views to themselves, taking great care to avoid a dangerous and futile contest.
    Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)