Members of The 1931 Seanad - Composition of The 1931 Seanad

Composition of The 1931 Seanad

The Free State Seanad was elected in stages and thus considered to be in permanent session. However, as a gesture of continuity with its Free State predecessor, the first Seanad elected after 1937 is numbered as the "Second Seanad". The Free State Senate, despite the occurrence of five senatorial elections before its abolition, is considered to have been a single 'Seanad' for the duration of its existence and is thus referred for that whole period as the "First Seanad".

There were a total of 60 seats in the Free State Seanad. In 1931, 23 Senators were elected. The Seanad election in 1925 was a popular election. However, at the 1928 and subsequent Free State Seanad elections, the franchise was restricted to Oireachtas members.

17 Senators had been elected at the 1928 Seanad election and 19 Senators had been elected at the 1925 Seanad election. In 1922, 35 Senators had been elected by Dáil Éireann, and 25 had been nominated by the President of the Executive Council, W. T. Cosgrave.

The following table shows the composition by party when the 1931 Seanad first met on 6 December 1931.

Elected in 1922 Nominated in 1922 Elected in 1925 Elected in 1928 Elected in 1931 Total
12 years 12 years 9 years 12 years 6 years 9 years 3 years 6 years 9 years
Cumann na nGaedheal 0 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 2 10
Labour Party 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 6
Farmers' Party 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 5
Fianna Fáil 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 6
Independents 1 5 1 1 2 0 1 1 7 19
Total 1 7 3 14 6 5 2 1 20 60
  • Note: The figure above do not add up due to the Senators whose political affiliations are currently unknown.

Read more about this topic:  Members Of The 1931 Seanad

Famous quotes containing the words composition of the and/or composition:

    When I think of God, when I think of him as existent, and when I believe him to be existent, my idea of him neither increases nor diminishes. But as it is certain there is a great difference betwixt the simple conception of the existence of an object, and the belief of it, and as this difference lies not in the parts or composition of the idea which we conceive; it follows, that it must lie in the manner in which we conceive it.
    David Hume (1711–1776)

    Give a scientist a problem and he will probably provide a solution; historians and sociologists, by contrast, can offer only opinions. Ask a dozen chemists the composition of an organic compound such as methane, and within a short time all twelve will have come up with the same solution of CH4. Ask, however, a dozen economists or sociologists to provide policies to reduce unemployment or the level of crime and twelve widely differing opinions are likely to be offered.
    Derek Gjertsen, British scientist, author. Science and Philosophy: Past and Present, ch. 3, Penguin (1989)