Theorem 2
Håstad demonstrates a tighter result than Theorem 1 i.e. the best known value for ε.
He constructs a PCP Verifier for 3-SAT that reads only 3 bits from the Proof.
For every ε > 0, there is a PCP-verifier M for 3-SAT that reads a random string r of length O(log(n)) and computes query positions ir, jr, kr in the proof π and a bit br. It accepts if and only if
π(ir) ⊕ π(jr) ⊕ π(kr) ⊕ = br.
The Verifier has completeness (1-ε) and soundness 1/2 + ε (refer to PCP (complexity)). The Verifier satisfies
If the first of these two equations were equated to "=1" as usual, one could find a proof π by solving a system of linear equations (see MAX-3LIN-EQN) implying P = NP.
- If z ∈ L, a fraction ≥ (1- ε) of clauses are satisfied.
- If z ∉ L, then for a (1/2- ε) fraction of R, 1/4 clauses are contradicted.
This is enough to prove the hardness of approximation ratio
Read more about this topic: MAX-3SAT
Famous quotes containing the word theorem:
“To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.”
—Albert Camus (19131960)