Material Point Method

The Material Point Method (MPM), is an extension of the Particle-in-cell (PIC) Method in computational fluid dynamics to computational solid dynamics, and is a Finite element method (FEM)-based particle method. It is primarily used for multiphase simulations, because of the ease of detecting contact without inter-penetration. It can also be used as an alternative to dynamic FEM methods to simulate large material deformations, because there is no re-meshing required by the MPM.

In the MPM, Lagrangian point masses, or material points, are moved through a Eulerian background mesh. At the end of each calculation cycle, a ‘convective’ step occurs, in which the mesh is reset to its original position, while material points remain in their current positions. There are two key differences between the PIC and MPM. The first one is that the MPM is formulated in the weak form similar to that for the FEM so that the FEM and MPM could be combined together for large-scale simulations. The second one is that history-dependent constitutive models could be formulated on the material points, which results in a robust spatial discretization method for multiphase and multi-physics problems.

Read more about Material Point Method:  History of PIC/MPM, Applications of PIC/MPM, Disadvantages of MPM

Famous quotes containing the words material, point and/or method:

    I do not deny the existence of material substance merely because I have no notion of it, but because the notion of it is inconsistent, or in other words, because it is repugnant that there should be a notion of it.
    George Berkeley (1685–1753)

    As for work, without it, without painstaking work, any writer or artist definitely remains a dilettante; there’s no point in waiting for so-called blissful moments, for inspiration; if it comes, so much the better—but you keep working anyway.
    Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev (1818–1883)

    If all feeling for grace and beauty were not extinguished in the mass of mankind at the actual moment, such a method of locomotion as cycling could never have found acceptance; no man or woman with the slightest aesthetic sense could assume the ludicrous position necessary for it.
    Ouida [Marie Louise De La Ramée] (1839–1908)