LPGA - Leading Career Money Winners

Leading Career Money Winners

The table below shows the top 10 career money leaders on the LPGA Tour at the end of the 2012 season. There is a more complete list, updated weekly during the Tour season, on the LPGA's official site.

Rank Player Country Earned Earnings ($)
1 Annika Sörenstam Sweden 1993–2008 22,573,192
2 Karrie Webb Australia 1995–2012 17,402,218
3 Lorena Ochoa Mexico 2003–2010 14,863,331
4 Cristie Kerr United States 1997–2012 14,368,457
5 Juli Inkster United States 1983–2012 13,442,946
6 Se Ri Pak South Korea 1997–2012 11,815,527
7 Paula Creamer United States 2005–2012 9,594,379
8 Suzann Pettersen Norway 2000–2012 9,368,341
9 Meg Mallon United States 1987–2010 9,051,459
10 Yani Tseng Taiwan 2009–2012 8,971,242

Read more about this topic:  LPGA

Other articles related to "leading career money winners, career":

Champions Tour - Leading Career Money Winners
... The table shows the top ten career money leaders on the Champions Tour through the end of the 2012 season ... The PGA Tour also publishes a list of Champions Tour players' total career earnings on its three tours here ...

Famous quotes containing the words winners, money, leading and/or career:

    The two real political parties in America are the Winners and the Losers. The people don’t acknowledge this. They claim membership in two imaginary parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, instead.
    Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. (b. 1922)

    We shall never get people whose time is money to take much interest in atoms.
    Samuel Butler (1835–1902)

    The clergyman is expected to be a kind of human Sunday. Things must not be done in him which are venial in the week-day classes. He is paid for this business of leading a stricter life than other people. It is his raison d’être.... This is why the clergyman is so often called a “vicar”Mhe being the person whose vicarious goodness is to stand for that of those entrusted to his charge.
    Samuel Butler (1835–1902)

    “Never hug and kiss your children! Mother love may make your children’s infancy unhappy and prevent them from pursuing a career or getting married!” That’s total hogwash, of course. But it shows on extreme example of what state-of-the-art “scientific” parenting was supposed to be in early twentieth-century America. After all, that was the heyday of efficiency experts, time-and-motion studies, and the like.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)