Lowest Common Denominator - Middle School Instruction

Middle School Instruction

Some K–1 math standards such as the latest revision of the NCTM math standards and reform mathematics textbooks created since the 1990s de-emphasize or omit coverage of the LCD entirely in favor of finding any common, but not necessarily the lowest common denominator, or by using less powerful methods such as fraction strips or "benchmark" fractions. The "cross-multiply" method of comparing fractions effectively creates a common denominator by multiplying both denominators together.

Algorithm finds lowest common denominator.

Lowest common denominator for 2/9 + 1/4 + 1/6:

Start with the 3 denominators in an upside-down division box. The algorithm uses similar division boxes going downward.

Start with 2 and see if it divides exactly into any of the three denominators. Then go to 3, then 5, then 7, and so on through prime numbers.

|_9_4_6_ 2|_9_4_6_ 2 doesn't go into 9 exactly. 2 goes into 4, leaving 2, and into 6, leaving 3. 2|_9_2_3_ 2 goes into 2, leaving 1. 3|_9_1_3_ 3 is the next divisor. 3 goes into 9, leaving 3, and into 3, leaving 1. 3|_3_1_1_ 3 goes into 3, leaving 1. |_1_1_1_

The process is to keep dividing the denominators until they reduce to 1. Then ignore the 1's and use the column of divisors as factors which produce the L.C.D.

2 x 2 x 3 x 3 = 36 = L.C.D.

Read more about this topic:  Lowest Common Denominator

Famous quotes containing the words middle, school and/or instruction:

    In middle life, the human back is spoiling for a technical knockout and will use the flimsiest excuse, even a sneeze, to fall apart.
    —E.B. (Elwyn Brooks)

    A man who graduated high in his class at Yale Law School and made partnership in a top law firm would be celebrated. A man who invested wisely would be admired, but a woman who accomplishes this is treated with suspicion.
    Barbra Streisand (b. 1942)

    Everything from airplanes to kitchen blenders—and even chopsticks—comes with an instruction manual. Children, despite all their complexity, do not.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)