Comparison
At and above a thousand million (≥ 109), the same numerical value has two different names, depending on whether the value is being expressed in the long or short scale. Equivalently, the same name has two different numerical values depending on whether it is being used in the long or short scale.
Each scale has a logical justification to explain the use of each such differing numerical name and value within that scale. The short-scale logic is based on powers of one thousand, whereas the long-scale logic is based on powers of one million. In both scales, the prefix bi- refers to "2" and tri- refers to "3", etc. However only in the long scale do the prefixes beyond one million indicate the actual power or exponent (of 1,000,000). In the short scale, the prefixes refer to one less than the exponent (of 1,000).
The relationship between the numeric values and the corresponding names in the two scales can be described as:
| Value in Scientific notation |
Value in numerals |
Short Scale | Long Scale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Logic | Name | Logic | ||
| 10 0 | 1 | one | one | ||
| 10 3 | 1,000 | thousand | thousand | ||
| 10 6 | 1,000,000 | million | million | ||
| 10 9 | 1,000,000,000 | billion | 1,000×1,0002 | thousand million or milliard | |
| 1012 | 1,000,000,000,000 | trillion | 1,000×1,0003 | billion | 1,000,0002 |
| 1015 | 1,000,000,000,000,000 | quadrillion | 1,000×1,0004 | thousand billion or billiard | |
| 1018 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 | quintillion | 1,000×1,0005 | trillion | 1,000,0003 |
| 1021 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | sextillion | 1,000×1,0006 | thousand trillion or trilliard | |
| 1024 | 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | septillion | 1,000×1,0007 | quadrillion | 1,000,0004 |
| etc. | etc. | To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000 |
To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000,000 |
||
The root mil in "million" does not refer to the numeral "one". Rather, it refers to the Latin word for "thousand" (milia).
The relationship between the names and the corresponding numeric values in the two scales can be described as:
| Name | Short Scale | Long Scale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value in Scientific notation |
Logic | Value in Scientific notation |
Logic | |
| million | 106 | 106 | ||
| billion | 109 | 1,000×1,0002 | 1012 | 1,000,0002 |
| trillion | 1012 | 1,000×1,0003 | 1018 | 1,000,0003 |
| quadrillion | 1015 | 1,000×1,0004 | 1024 | 1,000,0004 |
| etc. | To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000 |
To get from one named order of magnitude to the next: multiply by 1,000,000 |
||
The word milliard, or its translation, is found in many European languages and is used in those languages for 109. However, it is unknown in American English, which uses billion, and not used in British English, which preferred to use thousand million before the current usage of billion. The financial term yard, which derives from milliard, is used on financial markets, as it is unambiguous, unlike billion. Likewise, many long scale countries use the word billiard (or similar) for a thousand long scale billions (i.e. 1015), and the word trilliard (or similar) for a thousand long scale trillions (i.e. 1021), etc.
Read more about this topic: Long And Short Scales
Famous quotes containing the word comparison:
“[Girls] study under the paralyzing idea that their acquirements cannot be brought into practical use. They may subserve the purposes of promoting individual domestic pleasure and social enjoyment in conversation, but what are they in comparison with the grand stimulation of independence and self- reliance, of the capability of contributing to the comfort and happiness of those whom they love as their own souls?”
—Sarah M. Grimke (1792–1873)
“Certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moment’s comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Clay answered the petition by declaring that while he looked on the institution of slavery as an evil, it was ‘nothing in comparison with the far greater evil which would inevitably flow from a sudden and indiscriminate emancipation.’”
—State of Indiana, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)