Logical Quality
In many philosophies of logic statements are categorized into different logical qualities based on how they go about saying what they say. Doctrines of logical quality are an attempt to answer the question: “How many qualitatively different ways are there of saying something?” Aristotle answers, two: you can affirm something of something or deny something of something. Since Frege, the normal answer in the West, is only one, assertion, but what is said, the content of the claim, can vary. For Frege asserting the negation of a claim serves roughly the same role as denying a claim does in Aristotle. Other Western logicians such as Kant and Hegel answer, ultimately three; you can affirm, deny or make merely limiting affirmations, which transcend both affirmation and denial. In Indian logic, four logical qualities have been the norm, and Nagarjuna is sometimes interpreted as arguing for five.
Read more about Logical Quality: Aristotle's Two Logical Qualities, Making Do With A Single Logical Quality, Third Logical Qualities, The Indian Tradition, More Than One Quality Today
Famous quotes containing the words logical quality, logical and/or quality:
“The truth is, that common-sense, or thought as it first emerges above the level of the narrowly practical, is deeply imbued with that bad logical quality to which the epithet metaphysical is commonly applied; and nothing can clear it up but a severe course of logic.”
—Charles Sanders Peirce (18391914)
“It is merely a linguistic peculiarity, not a logical fact, that we say that is red instead of that reddens, either in the sense of growing, becoming, red, or in the sense of making something else red.”
—John Dewey (18591952)
“Emperor Joseph II: Your work is ingenious. Its quality work, and there are simply too many notes, thats all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect.
Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, majesty?”
—Peter Shaffer (b. 1926)