Local Government Commission For England (1992) - Summary of Proposals

Summary of Proposals

County Commission recommendations Government reaction Date in force
Avon four unitary authorities (Bristol, North Somerset, Bath and North East Somerset, South Gloucestershire) accepted 1996
Bedfordshire three unitary authorities (Bedford, Luton and Mid & South Beds) Luton unitary authority only; two-tier remainder 1997
Berkshire five unitary authorities (existing districts, with merger of Bracknell Forest and Windsor and Maidenhead as Royal East Berkshire) six unitary authorities (one for each district) 1998
Buckinghamshire four unitary authorities Milton Keynes unitary authority only; two-tier remainder 1997
Cambridgeshire no change Huntingdonshire and Peterborough referred back; Peterborough accepted 1998
Cheshire no change Halton and Warrington referred back; both accepted 1998
Cleveland four unitary authorities (Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland, Stockton-on-Tees) accepted 1996
Cornwall no change accepted
Cumbria no change accepted
Derbyshire Derby and North East Derbyshire (North East Derbyshire, Bolsover, Chesterfield); two-tier reminder referred back under new guidelines
Derby unitary authority; two-tier remainder accepted 1997
Devon Plymouth and Torbay unitary authorities; two-tier remainder Exeter referred back; rejected 1998
Dorset four unitary authorities (Bournemouth, Poole, East Dorset and West Dorset) Bournemouth and Poole unitary authorities only; two-tier remainder 1997
Durham Darlington unitary authority; two-tier remainder referred back under new guidelines
Darlington unitary authority; two-tier remainder accepted 1997
East Sussex Brighton and Hove unitary authority; two-tier remainder accepted 1997
Essex Southend-on-Sea unitary authority; two-tier remainder Basildon and Thurrock referred back; Thurrock accepted 1998
Gloucestershire no change referred back under new guidance
no change Gloucester referred back; rejected
Hampshire Southampton, Portsmouth and New Forest unitary authorities; remainder two-tier Southampton and Portsmouth unitary authorities only; two-tier remainder 1997
Hereford and Worcester Herefordshire unitary authority; two-tier Worcestershire accepted 1998
Hertfordshire no change accepted
Humberside four unitary authorities (East Riding of Yorkshire, Hull, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire) accepted † 1996
Isle of Wight one unitary authority accepted 1995
Kent no change Dartford, Gillingham, Gravesham and Rochester upon Medway referred back; Dartford and Gravesham rejected, Gillingham and Rochester joined to form Medway Towns unitary authority 1998
Lancashire no change Blackpool and Blackburn referred back; accepted 1998
Leicestershire Leicester and Rutland unitary authorities; two-tier remainder accepted 1997
Lincolnshire no change accepted
Norfolk no change Norwich referred back; rejected
North Yorkshire three unitary authorities (West Riding of Yorkshire, North Riding of Yorkshire, York) York unitary authority accepted; two-tier remainder 1996
Northamptonshire no change Northampton referred back; rejected
Northumberland no change accepted
Nottinghamshire Nottingham unitary authority; two-tier remainder Broxtowe, Gedling, Rushcliffe referred back; rejected 1998
Oxfordshire no change accepted
Shropshire no change The Wrekin referred back; accepted 1998
Somerset three unitary authorities (West, Mid and South) rejected; two-tier status quo kept
Staffordshire Stoke-on-Trent unitary authority; two-tier remainder accepted 1998
Suffolk no change accepted
Surrey no change Spelthorne referred back; rejected
Warwickshire no change accepted
West Sussex no change accepted
Wiltshire Thamesdown unitary authority; two-tier remainder accepted 1998

† since the government rejected the Commission's proposal for a West Riding of Yorkshire authority to include parts of North Yorkshire and the Goole area of Humberside, Goole became part of the new East Riding of Yorkshire instead.

Read more about this topic:  Local Government Commission For England (1992)

Famous quotes containing the words summary and/or proposals:

    I have simplified my politics into an utter detestation of all existing governments; and, as it is the shortest and most agreeable and summary feeling imaginable, the first moment of an universal republic would convert me into an advocate for single and uncontradicted despotism. The fact is, riches are power, and poverty is slavery all over the earth, and one sort of establishment is no better, nor worse, for a people than another.
    George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)

    One theme links together these new proposals for family policy—the idea that the family is exceedingly durable. Changes in structure and function and individual roles are not to be confused with the collapse of the family. Families remain more important in the lives of children than other institutions. Family ties are stronger and more vital than many of us imagine in the perennial atmosphere of crisis surrounding the subject.
    Joseph Featherstone (20th century)