Lithuanian Parliamentary Election, 2004 - Results

Results

e • d Summary of the 10 October and 24 October 2004 Lithuanian Seimas election results
Coalition Party Votes
(proportional)
% Seats
Proportional Constituency Total
Labour Party 340,035 28.4 22 17 39
Coalition of Algirdas Brazauskas and
Artūras Paulauskas "Working for Lithuania"
Social Democratic Party of Lithuania 246,852 20.7 16 15 20
New Union (Social Liberals) 11
Homeland Union (Lithuanian Conservatives) 176,409 14.8 11 14 25
Coalition of Rolandas Paksas
"For the Order and Justice"
Liberal Democratic Party 135,807 11.3 9 1 10
Lithuanian People's Union "For a Fair Lithuania"
Liberal and Centre Union 109,872 9.2 7 11 18
Peasants and New Democratic Party Union Lithuanian Peasants Party 78,902 6.6 5 5 10
New Democratic Party
Electoral Action of Poles in Lithuania 45,302 3.8 1 1 2
Christian Conservative Social Union 23,426 1.9
Lithuanian Christian Democrats 16,362 1.4
National Centre Party 5,989 0.5
Republican Party 4,326 0.4
Union of Lithuanian Socialists 3,977 0.3
Liberal Union of Lithuania 3,337 0.3
National Party Lithuanian Road 2,577 0.2
Lithuanian Nationalist Union 2,482 0.2
Independents 6 6
Invalid/blank votes 32,998
Total 1,228,653 100 70 71 141
Registered voters/turnout 2,666,196 46.1

Read more about this topic:  Lithuanian Parliamentary Election, 2004

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.
    Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)

    We do not raise our children alone.... Our children are also raised by every peer, institution, and family with which they come in contact. Yet parents today expect to be blamed for whatever results occur with their children, and they expect to do their parenting alone.
    Richard Louv (20th century)

    “The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.”
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)