Application Interpreted Constructs
AICs are specializations of the integrated application and generic resources. This is done by subtyping interfaced entities and adding further constraints and rules. No new stand-alone entities are created and no new explicit attributes are added. Most AICs are specializations in the geometric area. AICs did not exist back in 1994 when the first release of STEP got published. But when the 2nd generation of APs grows up it becomes clear that APs do not only share not only the IRs but also a lot of specializations. AICs are a big step towards AP interoperability.
- Part 501 - Edge-based wireframe
- Part 502 - Shell-based wireframe
- Part 503 - Geometrically bounded 2D wireframe
- Part 504 - Draughting annotation
- Part 505 - Drawing structure and administration
- Part 506 - Draughting elements
- Part 507 - Geometrically bounded surface
- Part 508 - Non-manifold surface
- Part 509 - Manifold surface
- Part 510 - Geometrically bounded wireframe
- Part 511 - Topologically bounded surface
- Part 512 - Faceted boundary representation
- Part 513 - Elementary boundary representation
- Part 514 - Advanced boundary representation
- Part 515 - Constructive solid geometry
- Part 517 - Mechanical design geometric presentation
- Part 518 - Mechanical design shaded representation
- Part 519 - Geometric tolerances
- Part 520 - Associative draughting elements
- Part 521 - Manifold subsurface
- Part 522 - Machining features
- Part 523 - Curve swept solid
Read more about this topic: List Of STEP (ISO 10303) Parts, AIC
Famous quotes containing the words application, interpreted and/or constructs:
“Most people, no doubt, when they espouse human rights, make their own mental reservations about the proper application of the word “human.””
—Suzanne Lafollette (1893–1983)
“Well, I always say the law was meant to be interpreted in a lenient manner. And that’s what I try to do, is sometimes I lean to one side of it, sometimes I lean to the other.”
—Irving Ravetch (b. 1920)
“Psychology has nothing to say about what women are really like, what they need and what they want, essentially because psychology does not know.... this failure is not limited to women; rather, the kind of psychology that has addressed itself to how people act and who they are has failed to understand in the first place why people act the way they do, and certainly failed to understand what might make them act differently.”
—Naomi Weisstein, U.S. psychologist, feminist, and author. Psychology Constructs the Female (1969)