Life Annuity - History

History

The instrument's evolution has been long and continues as part of actuarial science. Medieval German and Dutch cities and monasteries raised money by the sale of life annuities, and it was recognized that pricing them was difficult. The early practice for selling this instrument did not consider the age of the nominee, thereby raising interesting concerns. These concerns got the attention of several prominent mathematicians over the years, such as Huygens, Bernoulli, de Moivre and others: even Gauss and Laplace had an interest in matters pertaining to this instrument. It seems that Johan de Witt was the first writer to compute the value of a life annuity as the sum of expected discounted future payments, while Halley used the first mortality table drawn from experience for that calculation. Meanwhile, the Paris Hôtel-Dieu offered some fairly priced annuities that roughly fit the Deparcieux table discounted at 5%. Here is a quick comparison table of early life annuity prices:

Head age (x) Value of a unit annuity
Ulpian

ca. 200 AD

de Witt

1671

Hôtel Dieu

ca. 1680

Halley

1693

Deparcieux

1746

1 30 16 n/a 10,28 n/a
10 30 15,19 n/a 13,44 16,25
20 28 13,83 20 12,78 15,58
30 22 12,22 20 11,72 14,84
40 19 10,39 15 10,57 13,62
50 9 8,68 12 9,21 11,58
60 5 6,70 10 7,60 9,24
70 5 3,77 8 5,32 6,36
80 5 0 8 3,05 3,86
90 5 0 6 1,74 1,58
95 5 0 n/a 1,02 0
Values are approximated

Continuing practice is an everyday occurrence with well-known theory founded on robust mathematics, as witnessed by the hundreds of millions worldwide who receive regular remuneration via pension or the like. The modern approach to resolving the difficult problems related to a larger scope for this instrument applies many advanced mathematical approaches, such as stochastic methods, game theory, and other tools of financial mathematics.

Read more about this topic:  Life Annuity

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    “History does nothing; it does not possess immense riches, it does not fight battles. It is men, real, living, who do all this.... It is not “history” which uses men as a means of achieving—as if it were an individual person—its own ends. History is nothing but the activity of men in pursuit of their ends.”
    —Karl Marx (1818–1883)

    “Anyone who is practically acquainted with scientific work is aware that those who refuse to go beyond fact rarely get as far as fact; and anyone who has studied the history of science knows that almost every great step therein has been made by the “anticipation of Nature.””
    —Thomas Henry Huxley (1825–95)

    “Philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind.”
    —Imre Lakatos (1922–1974)