LGBT Adoption - Legal Status By Country/jurisdiction

Legal Status By Country/jurisdiction

Full joint adoption by same-sex couples is currently legal in the following countries:

  • Argentina (2010)
  • Belgium (2006)
  • Brazil (2010)
  • Canada (1999 onward, depending on province)
  • Denmark (2010)
  • Iceland (2006)
  • Netherlands (2001)
  • Norway (2009)
  • South Africa (2002)
  • Spain (2005)
  • Sweden (2002)
  • United Kingdom: England and Wales (2005), Scotland (2009) and Northern Ireland (unclear).
  • Uruguay (2009)

Full joint adoption by same-sex couples is currently legal in the following jurisdictions:

  • Australia: Western Australia (2002), Australian Capital Territory (2004), and New South Wales (2010).
  • Mexico: Mexico City (2010) and Coahuila.
  • United States: Rhode Island (1993), District of Columbia (1995), New Jersey (1998), New York (2002), California (2003), Indiana (2006), Maine (2007), Florida (2010), Arkansas (2011), Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon, Vermont, New Hampshire, Washington, Hawaii, Iowa, Nevada, Delaware, Guam

In the following countries, "stepchild-adoption" is permitted, so that the partner in a registered partnership (or unregistered cohabitation in Israel) can adopt the natural (or sometimes even adopted) child of his or her partner:

  • Finland (2009)
  • Germany (2004)
  • Greenland (2009)
  • Israel (2005) (Israel allowed overseas adoption and full joint adoption in several cases)

In the following jurisdictions permit "stepchild-adoption" in which onee partner in a civil union can adopt the natural (or sometimes even adopted) child of his or her partner:

  • Australia: Tasmania (2004)
  • United States: Pennsylvania (2002), Colorado, Montana

Read more about this topic:  LGBT Adoption

Famous quotes containing the words legal status, legal, status, country and/or jurisdiction:

    In the course of the actual attainment of selfish ends—an attainment conditioned in this way by universality—there is formed a system of complete interdependence, wherein the livelihood, happiness, and legal status of one man is interwoven with the livelihood, happiness, and rights of all. On this system, individual happiness, etc. depend, and only in this connected system are they actualized and secured.
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831)

    There are ... two minimum conditions necessary and sufficient for the existence of a legal system. On the one hand those rules of behavior which are valid according to the system’s ultimate criteria of validity must be generally obeyed, and on the other hand, its rules of recognition specifying the criteria of legal validity and its rules of change and adjudication must be effectively accepted as common public standards of official behavior by its officials.
    —H.L.A. (Herbert Lionel Adolphus)

    What is clear is that Christianity directed increased attention to childhood. For the first time in history it seemed important to decide what the moral status of children was. In the midst of this sometimes excessive concern, a new sympathy for children was promoted. Sometimes this meant criticizing adults. . . . So far as parents were put on the defensive in this way, the beginning of the Christian era marks a revolution in the child’s status.
    C. John Sommerville (20th century)

    In this country ... men seem to live for action as long as they can and sink into apathy when they retire.
    Charles Francis Adams, Sr. (1807–1886)

    The putting into force of laws which shall secure the conservation of our resources, as far as they may be within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, including the more important work of saving and restoring our forests and the great improvement of waterways, are all proper government functions which must involve large expenditure if properly performed.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)