Lenoir Cycle - Constant Pressure Heat Rejection (3-1)

Constant Pressure Heat Rejection (3-1)

The final stage (3-1) involves a constant pressure heat rejection back to the original state. From the first law of thermodynamics we find: .

From the definition of work:, we recover the following for the heat rejected during this process: .

As a result, we can determine the heat rejected as follows: {}_3Q_1 = mc_p \left( {T_1 - T_3 } \right) from the definition of constant pressure specific heats for an ideal gas: c_p = \frac{{\gamma R}} {{\gamma - 1}}.

The overall efficiency of the cycle is determined by the total work over the heat input, which for a Lenoir cycle equals \eta _{th} = \frac{{{}_2W_3 + {}_3W_1 }} {{{}_1Q_2 }}. Note that we gain work during the expansion process but lose some during the heat rejection process.

Read more about this topic:  Lenoir Cycle

Famous quotes containing the words constant, pressure, heat and/or rejection:

    “To keep up even a worthwhile tradition means vitiating the idea behind it which must necessarily be in a constant state of evolution: it is mad to try to express new feelings in a “mummified” form.”
    —Alfred Jarry (1873–1907)

    “I am convinced that our American society will become more and more vulgarized and that it will be fragmentized into contending economic, racial and religious pressure groups lacking in unity and common will, unless we can arrest the disintegration of the family and of community solidarity.”
    —Agnes E. Meyer (1887–1970)

    “Glories, like glow-worms, afar off shine bright,
    But looked to near, have neither heat nor light.”
    —John Webster (1580–1625)

    “To develop an empiricist account of science is to depict it as involving a search for truth only about the empirical world, about what is actual and observable.... It must involve throughout a resolute rejection of the demand for an explanation of the regularities in the observable course of nature, by means of truths concerning a reality beyond what is actual and observable, as a demand which plays no role in the scientific enterprise.”
    —Bas Van Fraassen (b. 1941)