Law of The Unconscious Statistician

In probability theory and statistics, the law of the unconscious statistician is a theorem used to calculate the expected value of a function g(X) of a random variable X when one knows the probability distribution of X but one does not explicitly know the distribution of g(X).

The form of the law can depend on the form in which one states the probability distribution of the random variable X. If it is a discrete distribution and one knows the probability mass function ƒX (not of g(X)), then the expected value of g(X) is

where the sum is over all possible values x of X. If it is a continuous distribution and one knows the probability density function ƒX (not of g(X)), then the expected value of g(X) is

(provided the values of X are real numbers as opposed to vectors, complex numbers, etc.).

Regardless of continuity-versus-discreteness and related issues, if one knows the cumulative probability distribution function FX (not of g(X)), then the expected value of g(X) is given by a Riemann–Stieltjes integral

(again assuming X is real-valued).

However, the result is so well known that it is usually used without stating a name for it: the name is not extensively used. For justifications of the result for discrete and continuous random variables see expected value.

Read more about Law Of The Unconscious Statistician:  From The Perspective of Measure

Famous quotes containing the words law of, law, unconscious and/or statistician:

    The shallow consider liberty a release from all law, from every constraint. The wise man sees in it, on the contrary, the potent Law of Laws.
    Walt Whitman (1819–1892)

    When shot, the deer seldom drops immediately, but runs sometimes for hours, the hunter in hot pursuit. This phase, known as ‘deer running,’ develops fleet runners, particularly in deer- jacking expeditions when the law is pursuing the hunters as swiftly as the hunters are pursuing the deer.
    —For the State of Maine, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    Whereas Freud was for the most part concerned with the morbid effects of unconscious repression, Jung was more interested in the manifestations of unconscious expression, first in the dream and eventually in all the more orderly products of religion and art and morals.
    Lewis Mumford (1895–1990)

    We are not concerned with the very poor. They are unthinkable, and only to be approached by the statistician or the poet.
    —E.M. (Edward Morgan)