The qualification of the judges is delegated by the Korean Constitution to the Court Organization Act. In the Court Organization Act Article 42 states that those who passed the National Judicial Examination and have completed the two year training at the Judicial Research and Training Institute (JRTI), or those who obtained qualifications as lawyers are eligible for becoming a judge. Though a small number of the judges are selected from practicing attorneys, an overwhelming number of them became judges right after graduation from the JRTI. The judicial reform in 2009 which established U.S. style law schools in lieu of the JRTI also requires the new judges to have a few years of law practice.
Judges in South Korea are nominated for their position by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Korea and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court Justices Council (a council composed of the Justices of the Supreme Court). Judges serve terms of 10 years, and may be re-appointed to their positions. The nomination process and terms of service above do not apply to Justices of the Supreme Court or to Justices of the Constitutional court, each of which has its own nomination process and term of service. See Supreme Court of South Korea and Constitutional Court of South Korea for the regulations for each.
The Constitution states that judges may not be removed from their offices except through impeachment, conviction of a crime and sentencing to imprisonment, or should they be unable to discharge their duties due to serious mental or physical impairment. The Court Organization Act sets the retirement age of judges as 63 and that for the Supreme Court justices, who are technically not "judge", is 65.
Other articles related to "judges, judge":
... In a 1983 memo analyzing a Senate resolution to limit the judges to 10-year terms, Roberts questioned the desirability of lifetime tenure, arguing ...
... must be proved "beyond reasonable doubt", and judges usually include this in the summing-up ... There is no absolute prescription as to how judges should explain reasonable doubt to juries ... Judges usually tell jurors that they will be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt if they "feel sure" or "are sure" that the defendant is guilty ...
... Lumpur Participants performed before two judges, Paul Moss and Syafinaz Selamat ... Contestants who impressed the judges made it through the next round ... Contestants whom the judges were unsure of were placed under the 'maybe' category where they performed again for the judges ...
... As judges, coaches, and skaters get more experience with the new system, more consensus may emerge ... points differences in component marks from different judges ... bias" determines about 20% of the mark given by a judge ...
... There are currently 2 Intermediate Court judges, both are locals ... The High Court currently consist of 3 Judges, 2 of whom are locals ... The Chief Justice was a High Court judge from Hong Kong ...
Famous quotes containing the word judges:
“If one judges love according to the greatest part of the effects it produces, it would appear to resemble rather hatred than kindness.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (16131680)
“The world, the wise world, that never is wrong itself, judges always by events. And if he should use me ill, then I shall be blamed for trusting him: if well, O then I did right, to be sure!But how would my censurers act in my case, before the event justifies or condemns the action, is the question.”
—Samuel Richardson (16891761)
“The judiciary has fallen to a very low state in this country. I think your part of the country has suffered especially. The federal judges of the South are a disgrace to any country, and Ill be damned if I put any man on the bench of whose character and ability there is the least doubt.”
—William Howard Taft (18571930)