Lands Administrative Divisions of Tasmania - Early Districts

Early Districts

Some early maps of Van Diemen's Land show 36 divisions, not covering the whole island. These were used since the 1820s. These were known as districts and preceded the survey of counties and parishes. The announcement in 1822 of a Muster (Census) mentions 32 districts or towns by name: Hobart Town, Argyle, Queenborough, Kingborough, Glenorchy, New Norfolk, Sorell, Clarence Plains, York, Cambridge, Ulva, Ormaig, Staffa, Caledon, Gloucester, Sussex, Harrington, Melville, Drummond, Strangford, Jarvis, Forbes, Green Ponds, Bath, Methven, Murray, Amherst, Lennox, Richmond, Norfolk Plains, Bathurst and Launceston.

This 1846 map shows the eleven counties thus far surveyed outlined, with parishes where existing. J. Archer's 1855 map shows a similar situation but with more bounded smaller subdivisions (including parishes) and the old unbounded district names superimposed, where appropriate. Subdivisions of counties include:

  1. Georgetown
  2. Launceston
  3. South Esk
  4. North Esk
  5. Norfolk Plains
  6. Western River
  7. Lake River
  8. Bathurst
  9. Lennox
  10. Richmond
  11. Methven
  12. Amherst
  13. Staffa
  14. Bath
  15. Murray
  16. Sorell
  17. Green Ponds
  18. Ormaig
  19. Harrington
  20. Gloucester
  21. Caledon
  22. Ulva
  23. Jarvis
  24. Strangford
  25. Macquarie
  26. New Norfolk
  27. Melville
  28. Drummond
  29. Queenboro
  30. Sussex
  31. Clarence Plains
  32. Cambridge
  33. Forbes
  34. Glenorchy
  35. Argyle
  36. Kingboro

Read more about this topic:  Lands Administrative Divisions Of Tasmania

Famous quotes containing the words early and/or districts:

    He had long before indulged most unfavourable sentiments of our fellow-subjects in America. For, as early as 1769,... he had said of them, “Sir, they are a race of convicts, and ought to be thankful for any thing we allow them short of hanging.”
    Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)

    Cities need old buildings so badly it is probably impossible for vigorous streets and districts to grow without them.... for really new ideas of any kind—no matter how ultimately profitable or otherwise successful some of them might prove to be—there is no leeway for such chancy trial, error and experimentation in the high-overhead economy of new construction. Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings.
    Jane Jacobs (b. 1916)