Example 2
| ♠ | Q 2 | ||||
| ♥ | 7 | ||||
| ♦ | 4 | ||||
| ♣ | 8 | ||||
| ♠ | 5 |
N |
♠ | A 6 | |
| ♥ | — | ♥ | J | ||
| ♦ | 9 6 5 | ♦ | A K | ||
| ♣ | 10 | ♣ | — | ||
| ♠ | K J 8 | ||||
| ♥ | — | ||||
| ♦ | 10 7 | ||||
| ♣ | — | ||||
A positional squeeze can entail an entry-shift, and in fact the squeeze given above is positional — it will not operate if the East-West hands are switched. But many knockout squeezes are not positional but automatic — that is, the threats are located such that the squeeze operates against either opponent. Here is an example:
With spades trump, North has the lead. South needs three of the last five tricks. He leads dummy's club to knockout-squeeze East. If East discards a trump, South will be able to take two trumps in his hand and ruff a diamond in dummy. If East discards anything else, South ruffs low and leads a diamond, to win two trumps and a red suit trick, or two trumps and a diamond ruff, depending on how East defends.
| ♠ | Q 2 | ||||
| ♥ | 7 | ||||
| ♦ | 4 | ||||
| ♣ | 8 | ||||
| ♠ | A 6 |
N |
♠ | 5 | |
| ♥ | J | ♥ | — | ||
| ♦ | A K | ♦ | 9 6 5 | ||
| ♣ | — | ♣ | 10 | ||
| ♠ | K J 8 | ||||
| ♥ | — | ||||
| ♦ | 10 7 | ||||
| ♣ | — | ||||
The ruff of the ♣8 in South's hand still operates a squeeze if the East-West hands are switched, so the position is an automatic squeeze:
South ruffs the ♣8 with the ♠8, and West is backwash-squeezed. The threats are the same as in the prior case, where East is squeezed. But the position is characteristic of a backwash squeeze: West is squeezed in three suits; one of the threats is against West's ability to lead trump effectively; there is no structural two-card menace consisting of an entry and a threat card; West is squeezed as South ruffs a card in the fourth suit.
Read more about this topic: Knockout Squeeze