Kaapvaal Craton - Description

Description

The Kaapvaal craton covers an area of approximately 1,200,000 km2 (460,000 sq mi) and is joined to the Zimbabwe craton to the north by the Limpopo Belt. To the south and west, the Kaapvaal craton is flanked by Proterozoic orogens, and to the east by the Lebombo monocline that contains Jurassic igneous rocks associated with the breakup of Gondwana.

The Kaapvaal craton formed and stabilized between 3.7 and 2.6 Ga by the emplacement of major granitoid batholiths that thickened and stabilized the continental crust during the early stages of an arc-related magmatism and sedimentation cycle. The craton is a mixture of early Archean (3.0-3.5 Ga) granite greenstone terranes and older tonalitic gneisses (ca. 3.6-3.7 Ga), intruded by a variety of granitic plutons (3.3-3.0 Ga). Subsequent evolution of the Kaapvaal craton (3.0-2.7 Ga) is thought to be associated with continent–arc collision that caused an overlaying successions of basins filled with thick sequences of both volcanic and sedimentary rocks. This was then followed by episodic extension and rifting when the Gaborone–Kanye and Ventersdorp sequences were developed. Early Archean crust is well exposed only on the east side of the craton and comprises a collage of subdomains and crustal blocks characterized by distinctive igneous rocks and deformations.

Late Archean metamorphism joined the Southern Marginal Zone of the Kaapvaal craton to the Northern Marginal Zone of the Zimbabwe craton approximately 2.8-2.5 Ga by the 250 kilometres (160 mi) wide orogenic Limpopo Belt. The belt is an east-northeast trending zone of granulite facies tectonites that separates the granitoid-greenstone terranes of the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons.

Read more about this topic:  Kaapvaal Craton

Famous quotes containing the word description:

    As they are not seen on their way down the streams, it is thought by fishermen that they never return, but waste away and die, clinging to rocks and stumps of trees for an indefinite period; a tragic feature in the scenery of the river bottoms worthy to be remembered with Shakespeare’s description of the sea-floor.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    God damnit, why must all those journalists be such sticklers for detail? Why, they’d hold you to an accurate description of the first time you ever made love, expecting you to remember the color of the room and the shape of the windows.
    Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)

    Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.
    Paul Tillich (1886–1965)