In The United States
Civil Procedure Doctrines |
---|
Justiciability |
Advisory opinions |
Standing · Ripeness · Mootness |
Political questions |
Jurisdiction |
Subject-matter jurisdiction |
|
|
Amount in controversy |
|
Pendent jurisdiction |
Ancillary jurisdiction |
|
|
Personal jurisdiction |
In personam |
In rem jurisdiction |
Quasi in rem jurisdiction |
Federalism |
Erie doctrine · Abstention |
Sovereign immunity · Abrogation |
Rooker-Feldman doctrine |
Adequate and independent state ground |
edit this template |
Justiciability is one of several criteria that the United States Supreme Court use to make a judgment granting writ of certiorari ("cert.").
In order for an issue to be justiciable by a United States federal court, all of the following conditions must be met:
- The parties must not be seeking an advisory opinion.
- There must be an actual controversy between the parties, meaning that the parties can not agree to a lawsuit where all parties seek the same particular judgment from the court (known as a collusive suit or friendly suit); rather, the parties must each be seeking a different outcome.
- The question must be neither unripe nor moot.
- An unripe question is one for which there is not yet at least a threatened injury to the plaintiff, or where all available judicial alternatives have not been exhausted.
- A moot question is one for which the potential for an injury to occur has ceased to exist, or where the injury has been removed. However, if the issue is likely to reoccur, yet will continually become moot before any challenge can reach a court of competent jurisdiction ("capable of repetition, yet evading review"), courts may allow a case that is moot to be litigated.
- The suit must not be seeking judgment upon a political question.
- Political questions involve matters where there is:
- "a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department" (meaning that the U.S. Constitution requires another branch of government to resolve questions regarding the issue); or
- "a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it."
- Political questions include such issues as whether the nation is 'at war' with another country, or whether the U.S. Senate has properly "tried" an impeached federal officer.
- Political questions involve matters where there is:
If the case fails to meet any one of these requirements, the court cannot hear it.
State courts tend to require a similar set of circumstances, although some states permit their courts to give advisory opinions on questions of law, even though there may be no actual dispute between parties to resolve.
Read more about this topic: Justiciability
Famous quotes containing the words united states, united and/or states:
“The House of Lords, architecturally, is a magnificent room, and the dignity, quiet, and repose of the scene made me unwillingly acknowledge that the Senate of the United States might possibly improve its manners. Perhaps in our desire for simplicity, absence of title, or badge of office we may have thrown over too much.”
—M. E. W. Sherwood (18261903)
“The rising power of the United States in world affairs ... requires, not a more compliant press, but a relentless barrage of facts and criticism.... Our job in this age, as I see it, is not to serve as cheerleaders for our side in the present world struggle but to help the largest possible number of people to see the realities of the changing and convulsive world in which American policy must operate.”
—James Reston (b. 1909)
“Not only [are] our states ... making peace with each other,... you and I, your Majesty, are making peace here, our own peace, the peace of soldiers and the peace of friends.”
—Yitzhak Rabin (b. 1922)