Relation To Ohm's Law
In the context of resistive circuits and in light of conservation of energy and electrical potential, Joule's first law and Ohm's law are equivalent and derivable from each other (as explained by James Clerk Maxwell in 1881, by Mascart in 1883, and by Oliver Heaviside in 1894), though they were discovered independently and experimentally, before the notions of conservation of energy and electrical potential were well developed.
Joule's first law states that the rate of heat dissipation in a resistive conductor is proportional to the square of the current through it and to its resistance. That is, the power dissipated in a resistor, in terms of the current through it and its resistance, is:
Joule arrived at this result experimentally in 1841, using a calorimeter to measure heat, and a galvanometer to measure current, with a variety of resistive circuits.
The law applies to any circuit that obeys Ohm's law, that is, that conducts a current proportional to the voltage across it, or equivalently, that can be characterized by a resistance. Ohm's law states that for a voltage V across a circuit of resistance R the current will be:
By substituting this formula for current into one or both factors of current in Joule's law, the power dissipated can be written in the equivalent forms:
The relation is actually more generally applicable than either Joule's law or Ohm's law, as it represents the instantaneous power being applied to a circuit with voltage V across it and current I into it, whether the circuit is resistive or not. In combination with either Ohm's law or Joule's law, it may be used to derive the other.
Since the power dissipated by a resistor is the amount of energy used (electrical work applied) per unit time, the total energy consumed and dissipated in time t is:
Read more about this topic: Joule's Laws
Famous quotes containing the words relation to, relation and/or law:
“A theory of the middle class: that it is not to be determined by its financial situation but rather by its relation to government. That is, one could shade down from an actual ruling or governing class to a class hopelessly out of relation to government, thinking of gov’t as beyond its control, of itself as wholly controlled by gov’t. Somewhere in between and in gradations is the group that has the sense that gov’t exists for it, and shapes its consciousness accordingly.”
—Lionel Trilling (1905–1975)
“Unaware of the absurdity of it, we introduce our own petty household rules into the economy of the universe for which the life of generations, peoples, of entire planets, has no importance in relation to the general development.”
—Alexander Herzen (1812–1870)
“America has always been a country of amateurs where the professional, that is to say, the man who claims authority as a member of an élite which knows the law in some field or other, is an object of distrust and resentment.”
—W.H. (Wystan Hugh)