John R. Leopold - Election Results

Election Results

  • 2006 Race for Anne Arundel County Executive
Voters to choose one:
Name Votes Percent Outcome
John R. Leopold, Rep. 93,668 51.0% Won
George F. Johnson, IV, Dem. 89,740 48.9% Lost
Other Write-Ins 176 0.1% Lost
  • 2002 Race for Maryland House of Delegates – District 31
Voters to choose three:
Name Votes Percent Outcome
John R. Leopold, Rep. 24,937 24.31% Won
Joan Cadden, Dem. 16,906 16.48% Won
Donald Dwyer, Jr., Rep. 16,807 16.39% Won
Thomas R. Gardner, Rep. 15,321 14.94% Lost
Mary Rosso, Dem. 15,127 14.75% Lost
Thomas J. Fleckenstein, Dem. 13,404 13.07% Lost
  • 1998 Race for Maryland House of Delegates – District 31
Voters to choose three:
Name Votes Percent Outcome
John R. Leopold, Rep. 21,632 23% Won
Joan Cadden, Dem. 19,214 20% Won
Mary Rosso, Dem. 15,372 16% Won
Victoria L. Schade, Rep. 15,366 16% Lost
Robert Schaeffer, Rep. 12,092 14% Lost
Thomas J. Fleckenstein, Dem. 11,862 12% Lost
  • 1994 Race for Maryland House of Delegates – District 31
Voters to choose three:
Name Votes Percent Outcome
John R. Leopold, Rep. 19,960 24% Won
Joan Cadden, Dem. 16,492 20% Won
Victoria L. Schade, Rep. 14,801 18% Won
W. Ray Huff, Dem. 14,203 17% Lost
C. Stokes Kolodziejski, Dem. 13,176 16% Lost
Douglas Arnold, Rep. 3,586 4% Lost
  • 1986 Race for Maryland House of Delegates – District 31
Voters to choose three:
Name Votes Percent Outcome
John R. Leopold, Rep. 14,586 22% Won
W. Ray Huff, Dem. 14,005 21% Won
Charles W. Kolodziejski, Dem. 13,050 20% Won
James J. Rilley, Dem. 12,895 20% Lost
Anthony J. Girandola, Rep. 5,950 9% Lost
Charles E. Beatty, Rep. 4,994 8% Lost

Read more about this topic:  John R. Leopold

Famous quotes containing the words election and/or results:

    Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few.
    George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)

    “The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.”
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)