John Jay Report - Nature of The Problem - Profile of The Alleged Abuses

Profile of The Alleged Abuses

The John Jay study found that, "Like in the general population, child sex abuse in the Catholic Church appears to be committed by men close to the children they allegedly abuse." According to the study, "many (abusers) appear to use grooming tactics to entice children into complying with the abuse, and the abuse occurs in the home of the alleged abuser or victim." The study characterized these enticements as actions such as buying the minor gifts, letting the victim drive a car and taking youths to sporting events. The most frequent context for abuse was a social event and many priests socialized with the families of victims. Abuses occurred in a variety of places with the most common being the residence of the priest.

The John Jay report catalogued more than twenty types of sexual abuse ranging from verbal harassment to penile penetration. It said that most of the abusers engaged in multiple types of abuses. According to the report, only 9% of the accused performed acts limited to improper touching over the victim's clothes. Slightly more than 27% of the allegations involved a cleric performing oral sex and 25% involved penile penetration or attempted penile penetration, reported the study. Most of the allegations involved touching over or under clothing.

The study said sexual abuse "includes contacts or interactions between a child and an adult when the child is being used as an object of sexual gratification for the adult." The report categorized allegations of sexual abuse even if the allegation did not involve force or genital or physical contact.

The alleged acts of abuse were in detail specified as follows:

Behavior alleged Number of Boys % Number of Girls % Totals combined %
Verbal (Sextalk) 885 11% 215 12% 1,100 11.6%
Shown Pornography 223 2.9% 9 0.5% 232 2.4%
Shown Porn videos 142 1.8% 6 0.3% 148 1.6%
Touch Over Cleric’s Clothes 704 9.1% 165 9.2% 869 9.2%
Touch Over Victim’s Clothes 2,862 37.2% 691 38.6% 3,553 37.4%
Touch Under Victim’s Clothes 3,280 42.6% 701 39.2% 3,981 42%
Cleric Disrobed 944 12.3% 177 9.9% 1,121 11,8%
Victim Disrobed 1,112 14.4% 303 16.9% 1,415 14.9%
Photos of Victim 169 2.2% 32 1.8% 201 2.1%
Sexual Games 96 1.2% 8 0.4% 104 1.1%
Hugging & Kissing 324 4.2% 175 9.8% 499 5.3%
Masturbation 663 8.6% 71 4.0% 734 7.7%
Mutual Masturbation 1,049 13.6% 29 1.6% 1,078 11.4%
Cleric Perform Oral Sex 1,186 15.4% 274 15.9% 1,460 15.4%
Victim Performed Oral Sex 799 10.4% 115 6.4% 914 9.6%
Manual Penetration 192 2.5% 195 10.9% 387 4.1%
Penetration with Object 61 0.8% 26 1.5% 87 0.9%
Penile Penetration 990 12.9% 213 11.9% 1,203 12.7%
Group or Coerced Sex 48 0.6% 4 0.2% 52 0.5%
Unspecified Sex Act 942 12.2% 204 11.4% 1,146 12.1%
Other 490 6.4% 87 4.9% 577 6.1%

Read more about this topic:  John Jay Report, Nature of The Problem

Famous quotes containing the words profile of the, profile of, profile, alleged and/or abuses:

    Nature centres into balls,
    And her proud ephemerals,
    Fast to surface and outside,
    Scan the profile of the sphere;
    Knew they what that signified,
    A new genesis were here.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Expecting rain, the profile of a day
    Wears its soul like a hat....
    John Ashbery (b. 1927)

    Nature centres into balls,
    And her proud ephemerals,
    Fast to surface and outside,
    Scan the profile of the sphere;
    Knew they what that signified,
    A new genesis were here.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Most observers of the French Revolution, especially the clever and noble ones, have explained it as a life-threatening and contagious illness. They have remained standing with the symptoms and have interpreted these in manifold and contrary ways. Some have regarded it as a merely local ill. The most ingenious opponents have pressed for castration. They well noticed that this alleged illness is nothing other than the crisis of beginning puberty.
    Novalis [Friedrich Von Hardenberg] (1772–1801)

    Obscenity is a moral concept in the verbal arsenal of the Establishment, which abuses the term by applying it, not to expressions of its own morality, but to those of another.
    Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979)