Issue
| Name | Birth | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| By Agnes of Barby-Mühlingen | |||
| Anna Maria | Zerbst, 13 June 1561 | Brzeg, 14 November 1605 | married on 19 May 1577 to Joachim Frederick, Duke of Legnica-Brzeg-Oława-Wołów |
| Agnes | Zerbst, 16 September 1562 | Bernburg, 4 June 1564 | |
| Elisabeth | Zerbst, 25 September 1563 | Crossen, 5 October 1607 | married on 19 May 1577 to John George, Elector of Brandenburg |
| Sibylla | Bernburg, 28 September 1564 | Leonberg, 26 October 1614 | married on 22 May 1581 to Frederick I, Duke of Württemberg |
| John George I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau | Harzgerode, 9 May 1567 | Dessau, 24 May 1618 | married on 22 February 1588 to Countess Dorothea of Mansfeld-Arnstein, and secondly on 21 February 1595 to Countess Palantine Dorothea of Simmern |
| Christian I, Prince of Anhalt-Bernburg | Bernburg, 11 May 1568 | Bernburg, 17 April 1630 | married on 2 July 1595 to Countess Anna of Bentheim-Steinfurt-Tecklenburg-Limburg |
| By Eleonore of Württemberg | |||
| Bernhard, Prince of Anhalt | b. Dessau, 25 September 1571 | Klosterhof bei Tyrnau, 24 November 1596) | |
| Agnes Hedwig | Dessau, 12 March 1573 | Sonderburg, 3 November 1616) | married on 3 January 1586 to Augustus, Elector of Saxony, and secondly on 14 February 1588 to John II, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg |
| Dorothea Maria | Dessau, 2 July 1574 | Weimar, 18 July 1617 | married on 7 January 1593 to John II, Duke of Saxe-Weimar |
| Augustus, Prince of Anhalt-Plötzkau | Dessau, 14 July 1575 | Plötzkau, 22 August 1653) | married on 25 January 1618 to Countess Sibylle of Solms-Laubach |
| Rudolph, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst | Harzgerode, 28 October 1576 | Zerbst, 30 July 1621 | married on 29 December 1605 to Dorothea Hedwig of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, and secondly on 31 August 1612 to Countess Magdalene of Oldenburg |
| John Ernest, Prince of Anhalt | Dessau, 1 May 1578 | Vienna, 22 December 1601 | |
| Louis I, Prince of Anhalt-Köthen | Dessau, 17 June 1579 | Köthen, 7 January 1650 | married on 31 October 1606 to Countess Amöena Amalie of Bentheim-Steinfurt-Tecklenburg-Limburg, and secondly on 12 September 1626 to Countess Sophie of Lippe |
| Sabine | Dessau, 7 November 1580 | Darmstadt, 28 March 1599 | |
| Joachim Christoph | Dessau, 7 July 1582 | Dessau, 16 July 1583 | |
| Anna Sophie | Dessau, 15 June 1584 | Oberkranichfeld, 9 June 1652) | married on 13 June 1613 to Charles Günther, Count of Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt |
| Joachim Ernest, Prince of Anhalt House of Ascania Born: 21 October 1536 Died: 6 December 1586 | ||
| Preceded by John V |
Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst with Karl I (until 1561) and Bernhard VII 1551–1570 |
Succeeded by Unification of all Anhalt Principalities |
| Preceded by George III |
Prince of Anhalt-Plötzkau with Karl I (until 1561) and Bernhard VII 1553–1570 |
|
| Preceded by Joachim I |
Prince of Anhalt-Dessau with Bernhard VII 1561–1570 |
|
| Preceded by Wolfgang |
Prince of Anhalt-Köthen with Bernhard VII 1562–1570 |
|
| Preceded by Principality created |
Prince of Anhalt 1570–1586 |
Succeeded by John George I Christian I Bernhard Augustus Rudolph John Ernest Louis |
| Persondata | |
|---|---|
| Name | Joachim Ernest of Anhalt |
| Alternative names | Joachim Ernst von Anhalt (German) |
| Short description | Prince of Anhalt (1570–1585) |
| Date of birth | 21 October 1536 |
| Place of birth | Dessau |
| Date of death | 6 December 1586 |
| Place of death | Dessau |
Read more about this topic: Joachim Ernest, Prince Of Anhalt, Ancestry and Issue
Famous quotes containing the word issue:
“I don’t have any problem with a reporter or a news person who says the President is uninformed on this issue or that issue. I don’t think any of us would challenge that. I do have a problem with the singular focus on this, as if that’s the only standard by which we ought to judge a president. What we learned in the last administration was how little having an encyclopedic grasp of all the facts has to do with governing.”
—David R. Gergen (b. 1942)
“Take away from the courts, if it could be taken away, the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes, and it would create a privileged class among the laborers and save the lawless among their number from a most needful remedy available to all men for the protection of their business interests against unlawful invasion.... The secondary boycott is an instrument of tyranny, and ought not to be made legitimate.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)
“The issue is a mighty one for all people and all time; and whoever aids the right, will be appreciated and remembered.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)