Principles of Kalam According To Rambam
In Book I Chapter 73, Rambam presents the 12 premises of the Mutakallimūn, and disputes most of them. The premises are, in brief, as follow:
- Existence of atoms: The world is composed of small particles which are not divisible, and which have no identifying essential properties (only accidents).
- Existence of vacuum: There exist certain spaces which are devoid of all substance and material.
- Time is discrete: Time is made up of fundamental instants which are not themselves subject to further division.
- Every body is subject to accidents: Any body must have either an accident (non-essential feature) or its opposite. A body cannot be without accidents.
- These accidents exist in the atom.
- An atom has one-instant duration: An atom does not persist (its accidents do not persist) more than one moment of time. God must repeatedly create these accidents at each time instant, or they permanently go out of existence.
- Accidents in bodies also do not persist and must be recreated. This and the previous principle constitute a denial of causality.
- Only substance and accident exist: Bodies differ only in regard to their accidents.
- Accidents subsist in a common substratum: An accident cannot subsist in another accident.
- Any state of affairs which can be imagined is admissible in intellectual argument.
- All kinds of infinity are impossible.
- The senses may be in error: The senses should not be trusted in matters of demonstration.
Not all of these principles were elements of the Jewish Kalam as practiced by particular thinkers. For example (Wolfson 1967), atomism was a principle embraced by Karaites but not by the Geonim or later Karaites. Wolfson considers it doubtful whether any Jewish thinkers ever embraced the denial of causality.
Famous quotes containing the words principles of and/or principles:
“I suppose that one of the psychological principles of advertising is to so hammer the name of your product into the mind of the timid buyer that when he is confronted with a brusk demand for an order he cant think of anything else to say, whether he wants it or not.”
—Robert Benchley (18891945)
“Ah, I fancy it is just the same with most of what you call your emancipation. You have read yourself into a number of new ideas and opinions. You have got a sort of smattering of recent discoveries in various fieldsdiscoveries that seem to overthrow certain principles which have hitherto been held impregnable and unassailable. But all this has only been a matter of intellect, Miss Westsuperficial acquisition. It has not passed into your blood.”
—Henrik Ibsen (18281906)