Japanese Communist Party - Policies

Policies

Communist parties
Africa Algeria
Egypt
Lesotho
Libya
Madagascar
Namibia
Réunion
Senegal
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tunisia
Americas Argentina - PCA • PCCE • PCRA
Bolivia
Brazil - PCdoB • PCB
Canada - CPoC • MLPoC
Chile - PCCh • PC(AP)
Colombia
Cuba
Ecuador
Mexico - PC • PPS • PPSM
Panama - PPP • PC(ml)P
Paraguay
Peru - PCP • PCdelP-PR
Uruguay
United States - CPUSA • PSL • WWP
Venezuela
Asia Bahrain
Bangladesh - CPB • WPB
Burma
China
India - CPI • CPI (M) • CPI (Maoist) • SUCI(C)
Iran - CPI • Tudeh Party
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan - CPK • CPPK
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Nepal - CPN (UML) • UCPN (M)
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Sri Lanka
Syria
Tajikistan
Taiwan - TCP • CPRC
Vietnam

Historical parties

Cambodia
Indonesia
Korea
Malaya and Singapore
Philippines
Saudi Arabia
Taiwan
Thailand
Europe Albania
Armenia
Austria - KPÖ • KI
Azerbaijan
Belarus (KPB)
Belgium - PvdA/PTB • KP • PC
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark - DKP • KPiD
Estonia
Finland
France - PCF • PCOF
Georgia
Germany
Greece - ΚΚΕ • ΚΟΕ • ΑΚΟΑ
Hungary
Ireland - CPI • WPI
Italy - PdCI • PRC
Luxembourg
Malta
Moldova
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia - CPRF • RCWP-RPC
San Marino
Serbia
Slovakia
Spain - PCE • PCC • PCPE
Sweden - KP • SKP
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom - CPB • NCPB • CPS

Historical parties

Czechoslovakia
East Germany
Italy
Netherlands
Romania
Soviet Union
United Kingdom
West Germany
Yugoslavia
Oceania Australia - CPA • CPA(ML)
New Zealand - CPA • WPNZ
Related topics Communism (history)
Marxism-Leninism
Democratic centralism

One of the JCP's main objectives is terminating the Japan–U.S. military alliance and the dismantling of all U.S. military bases in Japan. It wants to make Japan a non-aligned and neutral country, in accordance with its principles of self-determination and national sovereignty. (In Japan there are about 130 U.S. military bases and other related facilities, Okinawa having the largest U.S. military base in Asia).

With regards to Japan's own military forces, the JCP's current policy is that it is not principally opposed to its existence (in 2000 it decided that it will agree to its use should Japan ever get attacked), but that it will seek to abolish it in the long term, international situation permitting.

The JCP also opposes possession of nuclear weapons by any country or the concept of military blocs, and opposes any attempt to revise Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan, which says that "never again …... be visited with the horrors of war through the action of government". Regarding the resolution of disputes, it argues that priority must be given to peaceful means through negotiations, not to military solutions. The JCP says that Japan must adhere to the U.N. Charter.

The JCP adheres to the idea that Japan as an Asian country must stop putting emphasis on diplomacy centering on relations with the United States and the G8 Summit, and put Asian diplomacy at the center of its foreign relations. It supports Japan establishing an "independent foreign policy in the interests of the Japanese people," and rejects "uncritically following any foreign power".

The JCP advocates that Japan issue further apologies for its actions during World War II. In the 1930s, while the JCP was still illegal, it was the only political party to actively oppose Japan's war with China and World War II. Despite this, however, the JCP supports the territorial claims by Japan in the Kuril and Senkaku Islands disputes.

The JCP has traditionally been opposed to the existence of the Imperial House since the pre-war days. From 2004 it has acknowledged the Emperor as Japan's head of state as long as he remains a figurehead. JCP has stated that if the party comes to power, it will not ask the Emperor to abdicate; it is also against Japan's use of its national flag and national anthem which it sees as a relic of Japan's militarist past.

The JCP also strives to change the nation's economic policy of what it sees as serving the interests of large corporations and banks to one of "defending the interests of the people," and to establish "democratic rules" that will check the activities of large corporations and "protect the lives and basic rights of the people."

Regarding the issue of the international economy, the JCP has advocated establishing a new international democratic economic order on the basis of respect for the economic sovereignty of each country. The JCP sees the United States, transnational corporations and international financial capital as pushing globalization, which, it says, is seriously affecting the global economy, including the monetary and financial problems, as well as North-South and environmental problems. The JCP advocates "democratic regulation of activities by transnational corporations and international financial capital on an international scale."

The JCP stance on international terrorism is that only by "encircling the forces of terror through strong international solidarity with the United Nations at the center" can terrorism be eliminated. It argues that waging war as a response to terrorism "produces a rift and contradictions in international solidarity, which instead expands the breeding ground of terrorism."

Read more about this topic:  Japanese Communist Party

Famous quotes containing the word policies:

    A nation’s domestic and foreign policies and actions should be derived from the same standards of ethics, honesty and morality which are characteristic of the individual citizens of the nation.
    Jimmy Carter (James Earl Carter, Jr.)

    Unfortunately, we cannot rely solely on employers seeing that it is in their self-interest to change the workplace. Since the benefits of family-friendly policies are long-term, they may not be immediately visible or quantifiable; companies tend to look for success in the bottom line. On a deeper level, we are asking those in power to change the rules by which they themselves succeeded and with which they identify.
    Anne C. Weisberg (20th century)

    We urgently need a debate about the best ways of supporting families in modern America, without blinders that prevent us from seeing the full extent of dependence and interdependence in American life. As long as we pretend that only poor or abnormal families need outside assistance, we will shortchange poor families, overcompensate rich ones, and fail to come up with effective policies for helping families in the middle.
    Stephanie Coontz (20th century)