The Traditional Japanese Time System
The typical clock had six numbered hours from 9 to 4, which counted backwards from noon until midnight; the hour numbers 1 through 3 were not used in Japan for religious reasons, because these numbers of strokes were used by Buddhists to call to prayer. The count ran backwards because the earliest Japanese artificial timekeepers used the burning of incense to count down the time. Dawn and dusk were therefore both marked as the sixth hour in the Japanese timekeeping system.
In addition to the numbered temporal hours, each hour was assigned a sign from the Japanese zodiac. Starting at dawn, the six daytime hours were:
| Zodiac sign | Zodiac symbol | Japanese numeral | Strike | Solar time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hare | 卯 | 六 | 6 | sunrise |
| Dragon | 辰 | 五 | 5 | |
| Serpent | 巳 | 四 | 4 | |
| Horse | 午 | 九 | 9 | noon |
| Ram | 未 | 八 | 8 | |
| Monkey | 申 | 七 | 7 |
From dusk, the six nighttime hours were:
| Zodiac sign | Zodiac symbol | Japanese numeral | Strike | Solar time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cock | 酉 | 六 | 6 | sunset |
| Dog | 戌 | 五 | 5 | |
| Boar | 亥 | 四 | 4 | |
| Rat | 子 | 九 | 9 | midnight |
| Ox | 丑 | 八 | 8 | |
| Tiger | 寅 | 七 | 7 |
Read more about this topic: Japanese Clock
Famous quotes containing the words traditional, japanese, time and/or system:
“The invention of photography provided a radically new picture-making process—a process based not on synthesis but on selection. The difference was a basic one. Paintings were made—constructed from a storehouse of traditional schemes and skills and attitudes—but photographs, as the man on the street put, were taken.”
—Jean Szarkowski (b. 1925)
“I am a lantern—
My head a moon
Of Japanese paper, my gold beaten skin
Infinitely delicate and infinitely expensive.”
—Sylvia Plath (1932–1963)
“Vanity of science. Knowledge of physical science will not console me for ignorance of morality in time of affliction, but knowledge of morality will always console me for ignorance of physical science.”
—Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)
“UG [universal grammar] may be regarded as a characterization of the genetically determined language faculty. One may think of this faculty as a ‘language acquisition device,’ an innate component of the human mind that yields a particular language through interaction with present experience, a device that converts experience into a system of knowledge attained: knowledge of one or another language.”
—Noam Chomsky (b. 1928)