Jan Zwicky - Philosophy

Philosophy

Zwicky is an eco-political and anti-colonial thinker, comparable to fellow Canadian poets Tim Lilburn and Don McKay, who promotes the fundamental unity of ontology and ethics by laying emphasis on the act of attention.

Heraclitus, Plato, Freud, Woolf and Wittgenstein are among the thinkers who figure prominently in her philosophical work, which challenges the hegemonic status of logico-linguistic analysis in 20th and 21st Century Anglo-American philosophy. She has developed the notion of resonance as central to the understanding of ontological structures, and argues for its relevance in epistemology.

To Zwicky, form is integral to meaning. As part of this view, she maintains that the form of a linguistic gesture determines a speaker’s ontological commitments more thoroughly than any explicit content. For this reason, her own texts have an unusual structure: they are double texts. In both Lyric Philosophy and Wisdom & Metaphor, her own aphoristic remarks on the left-hand pages are meant to be read with and against excerpts from the history of philosophy, musical scores, paintings, photographs and poems. Her books are thus dialectical or polyphonic in nature (i.e. there are many voices that range across disciplines).

Her books also feature both a linear and a non-linear structure. The books can (and should) be read from front to back. That is, Zwicky carefully orders her remarks and has a rational, linear argument to make. But every page is also constructed so that it evokes remarks or images from other pages. In this way, her books are a dense, non-linear web of inter-connections — a resonant whole that is deep and can be plumbed for meaning. Works that display this type of resonance, whether composed in language, musical tones, colours, or other media, she calls lyric. She cites the writing of Heraclitus and Wittgenstein as philosophical examples, and argues that naturally-occurring ecologies have a similar resonant structure. Freud's distinction between primary and secondary processes, and Max Wertheimer's foundational work in gestalt psychology are also highly influential.

But Zwicky does not wish to supplant logical analysis with lyric understanding. Instead she construes the two as complementary and includes both in a broader conception of rationality. She believes that the Anglo-American notion of what constitutes "good" philosophy is excessively narrow; and that the so-called continental notion is rooted in the false idea that human thinking "constructs" the world. According to Zwicky, neglect of either logical or lyric thinking leads to our ontological, epistemological, ethical and environmental peril.

The great virtue of her philosophical writing is that it is enactive, leaving the reader with the very experience (and therefore some real understanding of what) she is discussing. In other words, it very purposefully has lyric structure like the philosophical work of Heraclitus and Wittgenstein.

Dr. James Young, chair of the University of Victoria philosophy department has said: "There’s a reasonable chance that people will be reading her work a century from now. This is something that one says about only a very small number of philosophers."

Read more about this topic:  Jan Zwicky

Famous quotes containing the word philosophy:

    La superstition met le monde entier en flammes; la philosophie les éteint. Superstition sets the whole world in flames; philosophy quenches them.
    Voltaire [François Marie Arouet] (1694–1778)

    Philosophy can be compared to some powders that are so corrosive that, after they have eaten away the infected flesh of a wound, they then devour the living flesh, rot the bones, and penetrate to the very marrow. Philosophy at first refutes errors. But if it is not stopped at this point, it goes on to attack truths. And when it is left on its own, it goes so far that it no longer knows where it is and can find no stopping place.
    Pierre Bayle (1647–1706)

    The result of civilization, at the Sandwich Islands and elsewhere, is found productive to the civilizers, destructive to the civilizees. It is said to be compensation—a very philosophical word; but it appears to be very much on the principle of the old game, “You lose, I win”: good philosophy for the winner.
    Herman Melville (1819–1891)