Jan Frans Vonck - Brabant Revolution

Brabant Revolution

During the Brabant Revolution, Vonck initially cooperated with Hendrik van der Noot and his faction of the Statists. In the course of the Revolution, Hendrik van der Noot became Voncks’ opponent as Van der Noot strived for the restoration of old privileges such as the "Joyous Entry", the "Blijde Inkomst". Vonck, influenced by developments in France on the other hand, aimed for less privileges. He pleaded for more democracy, and separation between legislative, executive and judicial powers. Vonck formulated his ideas in the Considérations impartiales sur l'état actuel du Brabant, which appeared in January 1790. Vonck aimed to reform the existing structures rather than an Assemblee nationale as established by the French Revolution. Vonck wanted to extend the representation of the three social classes in the States General: clergy, nobility and the bourgeoisie. The clergy had to increase in number with secular representatives and the nobility also had to increase in number. According to Vonck, the representation of the third class, the bourgeoisie, who consisted of patricians, had to be extended to the higher middle class. Van der Noot wanted to preserve the privileges of the nobility and the Catholic church. He considered Vonck to be a danger and started to pursue him as he did with other opponents. The house of Vonck was looted. On 17 March 1790, Vonck had to go into hiding in Brussels. Together with some comrades, Vonck had to leave France, where he eventually arrived in Lille. Meanwhile, Vonck got a passport under the name of Van Nuffel, the name of his mother. There he translated his Considerations into Dutch as Onzeydige Aenmerkingen over den tegenwoordige ghesteltenis van Brabant and he added to it a Kort historisch verhael tot inleyding uytgegeven door den advocaat Vonck. Shortly afterwards, he died in Lille.

Read more about this topic:  Jan Frans Vonck

Famous quotes containing the word revolution:

    It is as absurd to say that [due to motherhood] all women shall be denied the suffrage, as it would be to deny all men the suffrage, because some are liable, periodically, to inflammatory rheumatism, delirium tremens, or financial failure.
    Anonymous, U.S. women’s magazine contributor. The Revolution (February 17, 1870)