Ising Model - Definition

Definition

Given a graph Λ (for example, a d-dimensional lattice), per each lattice site j ∈ Λ there is a discrete variable σj such that σj ∈{+1, −1}. A spin configuration, σ = (σj)j∈Λ is an assignment of spin value to each lattice site.

For any two adjacent sites i, j ∈Λ one has an interaction Jij, and a site i ∈ Λ has an external magnetic field hi. The energy of a configuration σ is given by the Hamiltonian Function


H(\sigma) = - \sum_{<i~j>} J_{ij} \sigma_i \sigma_j -\sum_{j} h_j\sigma_j

where the first sum is over pairs of adjacent spins (every pair is counted once). indicates that sites i and j are nearest neighbors. The configuration probability is given by the Boltzmann distribution with inverse temperature β ≥0:


P_\beta(\sigma) ={e^{-\beta H(\sigma)} \over Z_\beta},
\,

where β = (kBT)-1

and the normalization constant


Z_\beta = \sum_\sigma e^{-\beta H(\sigma)} \,

is the partition function. For a function f of the spins ("observable"), one denotes by

the expectation (mean value) of f.

The configuration probabilities represent the probability of being in a state with configuration σ in equilibrium.

Read more about this topic:  Ising Model

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “The definition of good prose is proper words in their proper places; of good verse, the most proper words in their proper places. The propriety is in either case relative. The words in prose ought to express the intended meaning, and no more; if they attract attention to themselves, it is, in general, a fault.”
    —Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)

    “Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
    principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
    definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
    —Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)

    “The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
    —William James (1842–1910)