Iron Bowl - Game Results

Game Results

Since 1893, the Crimson Tide and Tigers have played 77 times. Alabama leads the all-time series, with 42 wins to Auburn's 34, with one tie. The game has been played in four cities: Auburn, Birmingham, Montgomery, and Tuscaloosa. Alabama leads the series in Birmingham (34–18–1). Auburn leads the series in Tuscaloosa (7–2) and Auburn (7–4). The series is tied in Montgomery (2–2). Alabama leads the series since it was resumed in the modern era in 1948 (38-27). For the first time in the series history, the previous three winners have all gone on to win the BCS National Championship Game: Alabama in 2009, Auburn in 2010, and Alabama again in 2011. It also marks the first time that two different teams from the same state won consecutive BCS National Championships.

Alabama victories are colored ██ crimson. Auburn victories are colored ██ navy blue. Ties are white.

# Date Location Winner Score Series
Alabama Auburn
1 February 22, 1893 Birmingham, AL Auburn 22 32 AU 1–0–0
2 November 30, 1893 Montgomery, AL Auburn 16 40 AU 2–0–0
3 November 29, 1894 Montgomery, AL Alabama 18 0 AU 2–1–0
4 November 23, 1895 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 0 48 AU 3–1–0
5 November 17, 1900 Montgomery, AL Auburn 5 53 AU 4–1–0
6 November 15, 1901 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 0 17 AU 5–1–0
7 October 18, 1902 Birmingham, AL Auburn 0 23 AU 6–1–0
8 October 23, 1903 Montgomery, AL Alabama 18 6 AU 6–2–0
9 November 12, 1904 Birmingham, AL Auburn 5 29 AU 7–2–0
10 November 18, 1905 Birmingham, AL Alabama 30 0 AU 7–3–0
11 November 17, 1906 Birmingham, AL Alabama 10 0 AU 7–4–0
12 November 16, 1907 Birmingham, AL Tie 6 6 AU 7–4–1
13 December 4, 1948 Birmingham, AL Alabama 55 0 AU 7–5–1
14 December 3, 1949 Birmingham, AL Auburn 13 14 AU 8–5–1
15 December 2, 1950 Birmingham, AL Alabama 34 0 AU 8–6–1
16 December 2, 1951 Birmingham, AL Alabama 25 7 AU 8–7–1
17 November 29, 1952 Birmingham, AL Alabama 21 0 Tie 8–8–1
18 November 28, 1953 Birmingham, AL Alabama 10 7 AL 9–8–1
19 November 27, 1954 Birmingham, AL Auburn 0 8 Tie 9–9–1
20 November 26, 1955 Birmingham, AL Auburn 0 26 AU 10–9–1
21 December 1, 1956 Birmingham, AL Auburn 7 34 AU 11–9–1
22 November 30, 1957 Birmingham, AL Auburn 0 40 AU 12–9–1
23 November 29, 1958 Birmingham, AL Auburn 8 14 AU 13–9–1
24 November 28, 1959 Birmingham, AL Alabama 10 0 AU 13–10–1
25 November 26, 1960 Birmingham, AL Alabama 3 0 AU 13–11–1
26 December 2, 1961 Birmingham, AL Alabama 34 0 AU 13–12–1
27 December 1, 1962 Birmingham, AL Alabama 38 0 Tie 13–13–1
28 November 30, 1963 Birmingham, AL Auburn 8 10 AU 14–13–1
29 November 26, 1964 Birmingham, AL Alabama 21 14 Tie 14–14–1
30 November 27, 1965 Birmingham, AL Alabama 30 3 AL 15–14–1
31 December 3, 1966 Birmingham, AL Alabama 31 0 AL 16–14–1
32 December 2, 1967 Birmingham, AL Alabama 7 3 AL 17–14–1
33 November 30, 1968 Birmingham, AL Alabama 24 16 AL 18–14–1
34 November 29, 1969 Birmingham, AL Auburn 26 49 AL 18–15–1
35 November 28, 1970 Birmingham, AL Auburn 28 33 AL 18–16–1
36 November 27, 1971 Birmingham, AL Alabama 31 7 AL 19–16–1
37 December 2, 1972 Birmingham, AL Auburn 16 17 AL 19–17–1
38 December 1, 1973 Birmingham, AL Alabama 35 0 AL 20–17–1
39 November 29, 1974 Birmingham, AL Alabama 17 13 AL 21–17–1
40 November 29, 1975 Birmingham, AL Alabama 28 0 AL 22–17–1
41 November 27, 1976 Birmingham, AL Alabama 38 7 AL 23–17–1
42 November 26, 1977 Birmingham, AL Alabama 48 21 AL 24–17–1
43 December 2, 1978 Birmingham, AL Alabama 34 16 AL 25–17–1
44 December 1, 1979 Birmingham, AL Alabama 25 18 AL 26–17–1
45 November 29, 1980 Birmingham, AL Alabama 34 18 AL 27–17–1
46 November 28, 1981 Birmingham, AL Alabama 28 17 AL 28–17–1
47 November 27, 1982 Birmingham, AL Auburn 22 23 AL 28–18–1
48 December 3, 1983 Birmingham, AL Auburn 20 23 AL 28–19–1
49 December 1, 1984 Birmingham, AL Alabama 17 15 AL 29–19–1
50 November 30, 1985 Birmingham, AL Alabama 25 23 AL 30–19–1
51 November 29, 1986 Birmingham, AL Auburn 17 21 AL 30–20–1
52 November 27, 1987 Birmingham, AL Auburn 0 10 AL 30–21–1
53 November 25, 1988 Birmingham, AL Auburn 10 15 AL 30–22–1
54 December 2, 1989 Auburn, AL Auburn 20 30 AL 30–23–1
55 December 1, 1990 Birmingham, AL Alabama 16 7 AL 31–23–1
56 November 30, 1991 Birmingham, AL Alabama 13 6 AL 32–23–1
57 November 26, 1992 Birmingham, AL Alabama 17 0 AL 33–23–1
58 November 20, 1993 Auburn, AL Auburn 14 22 AL 33–24–1
59 November 19, 1994 Birmingham, AL Alabama 21 14 AL 34–24–1
60 November 18, 1995 Auburn AL Auburn 27 31 AL 34–25–1
61 November 23, 1996 Birmingham, AL Alabama 24 23 AL 35–25–1
62 November 22, 1997 Auburn, AL Auburn 17 18 AL 35–26–1
63 November 21, 1998 Birmingham, AL Alabama 31 17 AL 36–26–1
64 November 20, 1999 Auburn, AL Alabama 28 17 AL 37–26–1
65 November 18, 2000 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 0 9 AL 37–27–1
66 November 17, 2001 Auburn, AL Alabama 31 7 AL 38–27–1
67 November 23, 2002 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 7 17 AL 38–28–1
68 November 22, 2003 Auburn, AL Auburn 23 28 AL 38–29–1
69 November 20, 2004 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 13 21 AL 38–30–1
70 November 19, 2005 Auburn, AL Auburn 18 28 AL 38–31–1
71 November 18, 2006 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 15 22 AL 38–32–1
72 November 24, 2007 Auburn, AL Auburn 10 17 AL 38–33–1
73 November 29, 2008 Tuscaloosa, AL Alabama 36 0 AL 39–33–1
74 November 27, 2009 Auburn, AL Alabama 26 21 AL 40–33–1
75 November 26, 2010 Tuscaloosa, AL Auburn 27 28 AL 40–34–1
76 November 26, 2011 Auburn, AL Alabama 42 14 AL 41–34–1
77 November 24, 2012 Tuscaloosa, AL Alabama 49 0 AL 42-34-1

Series record sources: 2011 Alabama Football Media Guide, 2011 Auburn Football Media Guide, and College Football Data Warehouse.

Read more about this topic:  Iron Bowl

Famous quotes containing the words game and/or results:

    “Art is a concrete and personal and rather childish thing after all—no matter what people do to graft it into science and make it sociological and psychological; it is no good at all unless it is let alone to be itself—a game of make-believe, or re-production, very exciting and delightful to people who have an ear for it or an eye for it.”
    —Willa Cather (1873–1947)

    “There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
    —Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)