Background of The Act
The act was passed in response to rising public concern with the growing power and wealth of corporations, particularly railroads, during the late nineteenth century. Railroads had become the principal form of transportation for both people and goods, and the prices they charged and the practices they adopted greatly influenced individuals and businesses. In some cases, the railroads were perceived to have abused their power as a result of too little competition. Railroads also banded together to form pools and trusts that fixed rates at higher levels than they could otherwise command.
Larger railroads alarmed populist activists by attempting to engage in predatory pricing. In spite of its broad appeal as a means of drumming up support for price regulation, predatory pricing is not a sustainable practice. Even if a competitor is forced out of business, that firm's capital remains intact and may be purchased by a new entrepreneur. The so-called predator cannot engage in such pricing indefinitely.
Railroads often charged more for short hauls than for long hauls. The practice was decried as one that discriminated against smaller businesses, when it was in fact a practice based on scale economies.
Responding to a widespread public outcry, states passed numerous pieces of legislation. Through the 1870s various constituencies, notably the Grange movement representing farmers, lobbied Congress to regulate railroads, but Congress declined to step in. However, in a decision in 1886, Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state laws regulating interstate railroads were unconstitutional because they violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive power "to regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." The following year, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which was signed into law by President Grover Cleveland on February 4, 1887.
The act worked to keep rates and railroad revenue up on routes where competition existed. It did this by attempting to force publicity about rates and make rebates and discrimination illegal. ('Discrimination' meant lower rates for certain customers, e.g. politicians, large customers, sharp bargainers, long haul shippers, shippers in competitive markets, low season travelers.) Railroads saw that competition made it hard to pay their stockholders and bondholders the amount of money promised them, and competition was therefore "bad."
Read more about this topic: Interstate Commerce Act Of 1887
Famous quotes containing the words background of the, background of, background and/or act:
“Pilate with his question What is truth? is gladly trotted out these days as an advocate of Christ, so as to arouse the suspicion that everything known and knowable is an illusion and to erect the cross upon that gruesome background of the impossibility of knowledge.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)
“In the true sense ones native land, with its background of tradition, early impressions, reminiscences and other things dear to one, is not enough to make sensitive human beings feel at home.”
—Emma Goldman (18691940)
“Silence is the universal refuge, the sequel to all dull discourses and all foolish acts, a balm to our every chagrin, as welcome after satiety as after disappointment; that background which the painter may not daub, be he master or bungler, and which, however awkward a figure we may have made in the foreground, remains ever our inviolable asylum, where no indignity can assail, no personality can disturb us.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“You know you dont have to act with me, Steve. You dont have to say anything, and you dont have to do anything. Not a thing. Oh, maybe just whistle. You know how to whistle, dont you, Steve? You just put your lips together, and blow.”
—Jules Furthman (18881960)