Intersection Theory - Topological Intersection Form

Topological Intersection Form

See also: ε-quadratic form#Manifolds

For a connected oriented manifold M of dimension 2n the intersection form is defined on the nth cohomology group (what is usually called the 'middle dimension') by the evaluation of the cup product on the fundamental class . Stated precisely, there is a bilinear form

given by

with

This is a symmetric form for n even (so 2n=4k doubly even), in which case the signature of M is defined to be the signature of the form, and an alternating form for n odd (so 2n=4k+2 singly even). These can be referred to uniformly as ε-symmetric forms, where ε = respectively for symmetric and skew-symmetric forms. It is possible in some circumstances to refine this form to an ε-quadratic form, though this requires additional data such as a framing of the tangent bundle. It is possible to drop the orientability condition and work with coefficients instead.

These forms are important topological invariants. For example, a theorem of Michael Freedman states that simply connected compact 4-manifolds are (almost) determined by their intersection forms up to homeomorphism – see intersection form (4-manifold).

By Poincaré duality, it turns out that there is a way to think of this geometrically. If possible, choose representative n-dimensional submanifolds A, B for the Poincaré duals of a and b. Then (a, b) is the oriented intersection number of A and B, which is well-defined because of the dimensions of A and B. This explains the terminology intersection form.

Read more about this topic:  Intersection Theory

Famous quotes containing the words intersection and/or form:

    You can always tell a Midwestern couple in Europe because they will be standing in the middle of a busy intersection looking at a wind-blown map and arguing over which way is west. European cities, with their wandering streets and undisciplined alleys, drive Midwesterners practically insane.
    Bill Bryson (b. 1951)

    To do the opposite of something is also a form of imitation, namely an imitation of its opposite.
    —G.C. (Georg Christoph)