International Relations - Individual or Sub-unit Level Concepts

Individual or Sub-unit Level Concepts

The level beneath the unit (state) level can be useful both for explaining factors in international relations that other theories fail to explain, and for moving away from a state-centric view of international relations.

  • Psychological factors in international relations – Evaluating psychological factors in international relations comes from the understanding that a state is not a "black box" as proposed by Realism, and that there may be other influences on foreign policy decisions. Examining the role of personalities in the decision making process can have some explanatory power, as can the role of misperception between various actors. A prominent application of sub-unit level psychological factors in international relations is the concept of Groupthink, another is the propensity of policymakers to think in terms of analogies.
  • Bureaucratic politics – Looks at the role of the bureaucracy in decision making, and sees decisions as a result of bureaucratic in-fighting, and as having been shaped by various constraints.
  • Religious, ethnic, and secessionist groups – Viewing these aspects of the sub-unit level has explanatory power with regards to ethnic conflicts, religious wars, transnational diaspora (diaspora politics) and other actors which do not consider themselves to fit with the defined state boundaries. This is particularly useful in the context of the pre-modern world of weak states.
  • Science, technology and international relations – How science and technology impact the global health, business, environment, technology, and development.
  • International political economy, and economic factors in international relations.
  • International political culturology – Looks at how culture and cultural variables impact in international relations.

Read more about this topic:  International Relations

Famous quotes containing the words individual, level and/or concepts:

    Is it not possible that an individual may be right and a government wrong? Are laws to be enforced simply because they were made? or declared by any number of men to be good, if they are not good? Is there any necessity for a man’s being a tool to perform a deed of which his better nature disapproves?
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    [A writer] should try not to be too far, personally, below the level of his work.
    Elizabeth Bowen (1899–1973)

    When you have broken the reality into concepts you never can reconstruct it in its wholeness.
    William James (1842–1910)