Independent Practitioners Network is an organization for human development practitioners based on peer support and monitoring.
Membership of IPN is open solely to groups of practitioners. Groups gain full membership of the IPN by having at least 5 members, by publishing a code of ethics and by linking to at least two other groups.
Individuals cannot join the Network directly although they can be involved in its activities. Practitioners may include psychotherapists, counsellors, trainers, teachers or anyone who could be reasonably be associated with any of these activities. IPN supports diversity and groups typically embrace a number of different practices.
The function of the groups is for their members to support and monitor each other's practice in whatever way they decide in order that they are prepared to "stand by" that practice. The function of the links is for link groups to cross moderate the processes whereby each group's members claim to be able to "stand by" the practices of the other members of the group.
Some members of IPN groups see it solely as a vehicle for supporting good practice. Others also use it a basis of accreditation, generally as an alternative to other hierarchical, specification based accreditation schemes. IPN does not confer any form of accreditation but individuals can claim to be accredited through participation in the IPN process or, if their group agrees, they can be accredited by their group.
IPN currently operates in, but is not restricted to, the United Kingdom.
Famous quotes containing the words independent and/or network:
“The ex-Presidential situation has its advantages, but with them are certain drawbacks. The correspondence is large. The meritorious demands on one are large. More independent out than in place, but still something of the bondage of the place that was willingly left. On the whole, however, I find many reasons to be content.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)
“A culture may be conceived as a network of beliefs and purposes in which any string in the net pulls and is pulled by the others, thus perpetually changing the configuration of the whole. If the cultural element called morals takes on a new shape, we must ask what other strings have pulled it out of line. It cannot be one solitary string, nor even the strings nearby, for the network is three-dimensional at least.”
—Jacques Barzun (b. 1907)