Structure
The Inca army was divided in the following manner:
Inca Rank | Current equivalent | Number of soldiers under their command |
---|---|---|
Aucac Runa | Soldier | 0 |
PĂșcara Camayuk | Castillian | 0 |
Runancha | Guide | 0 |
Quipa Camayuk | Trumpeter (wooden trumpet) |
0 |
Choru Camayuk | Trumpeter (conch shell) |
0 |
Huancar Camayuk | Drummer | 0 |
Unanchayanac | Subaltern | 5 |
Chunga Kamayuk | Sub-lieutenant | 10 |
Piccka Chunka Kamayuk | Lieutenant | 50 |
Pachac Kamayuk | Centurion | 100 |
Guaranga Kamayuk | Battalion Leader | 1,000 |
Kamayuk | Officer | - |
Apu Randin | Captain Lieutenant | - |
Hatun Apu Randin | Lieutenant Commander | - |
Apu | Captain | - |
Hatun Apu | Brigadier General | 4,000-5,000 |
Apusquin Rantin | Major General | 10,000 |
Apusquispay | Army General | The whole field army |
The largest units in the Inca army were composed of 10,000 men, under the command of a Major General or Apusquin Rantin. This was generally a nobleman from Cuzco who would have been a veteran of several campaigns. The head of the field army was the Apusquispay, he would have been a noble chosen by the Inca and he would have shown himself to have been in good physical and mental condition at the Huarachico trials. In order to give orders the generals used conche blowers, trumpeters or drummers to communicate with their lieutenants.
Read more about this topic: Inca Army
Famous quotes containing the word structure:
“Agnosticism is a perfectly respectable and tenable philosophical position; it is not dogmatic and makes no pronouncements about the ultimate truths of the universe. It remains open to evidence and persuasion; lacking faith, it nevertheless does not deride faith. Atheism, on the other hand, is as unyielding and dogmatic about religious belief as true believers are about heathens. It tries to use reason to demolish a structure that is not built upon reason.”
—Sydney J. Harris (19171986)
“A special feature of the structure of our book is the monstrous but perfectly organic part that eavesdropping plays in it.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (18991977)
“The philosopher believes that the value of his philosophy lies in its totality, in its structure: posterity discovers it in the stones with which he built and with which other structures are subsequently built that are frequently betterand so, in the fact that that structure can be demolished and yet still possess value as material.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)